Hi Steve, thanks for your support. I am going to the snowies for a week and I will try these new modes for sure. I hope the bad weather will stay in Sydney..hihi all the best, 73, John On 13/02/2012 4:51 PM, "Steve" <stevez@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I find your work and your informative descriptions of what you're doing > always very interesting. > > Thanks John. > > Steve. > > > > On 02/13/2012 03:56 PM, John Douyere wrote: > >> I just wanted to share some of the initial tests of PSK and PSKR multiple >> carriers and I have to say I am pretty happy so far. I tested 2 x PSK500R >> and 3 x PSK500R and it is still pretty robust. >> >> I had definitely multipath reception in the waterfall and despite that I >> had very few repeats. 2 x PSK500R gives us 10% more speed than PSK500 but >> it **looks** more robust from today's observations, in a 1200Hz bandwidth. >> >> 3 x PSK500R gives 55% more speed than PSK500 BUT at almost 4 times the >> bandwidth! >> >> I also tested 2 x PSK500 and that really flies with a 17174 bytes email >> document (text only) downloaded in 2 minutes 25 seconds from the receive of >> the FM command to the TX of the FA command. That is 7,107 characters per >> minute, in a 1200Hz bandwidth...not bad at all. >> >> Another way to look at it: that is 5.92 characters per minute per Hertz >> of bandwidth, **in real life, with QRM and block repeats**, not theoretical >> best case! >> >> The theoretical best case of 2 x PSK500 with a 1 seconds TX delay on both >> sides is 8,078 characters per minute net speed or 6.7 CPM/Hertz with the >> current ARQ overheads. >> >> If we increase the number of blocks of data per transmission to 16 >> instead of 8, we get a net speed of almost 9,400CPM. Then reduce the delay >> on each side to 1/2 second and we get over the 10,000CPM in the same 1200Hz >> bandwidth. >> >> I will also test the 4 x PSK500 and 4 x PSK500R on FM too and report. >> >> The next development steps will be to switch the "Nitrous Oxide ON" with >> 4 PSK and maybe 8 PSK..... >> >> I'll keep you posted. >> >> 73, John (VK2ETA) >> >> >> >> >