[pskmail] Re: Notes and questions related to last weekend's tests

  • From: roger g6ckr <radio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:44:43 +0000

Hi.
In the latest versions of flarq Dave has added 10 X <soh> in a row and
this seems to help a lot with syncing.
I have been helping with crossed audio testing on a pair of pc's
DominoEx was not one of the modes I tested with as it was mainly the psk
versions and MFSK16 we were interested in.
I will run some tests using DominoEX and report how it does with the 10
<soh> leading string setup on flarq / fldigi.
73 Roger G6CKR

On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 11:22 +1100, John Douyere wrote:
> Hello, I did some more experiments with Pskmail last weekend while
> camping and here are my notes and questions:
>  
> 1. PSK63 vs 125 vs 250: I found that again the faster speeds more than
> compensate for the loss of sentivity in getting the packets across
> intact. Maybe in low noise, low signal would PSK63 be better, but I
> haven't come across this condition yet in practice.
>  
> 2. DominoEx: I had another go at this mode with little success. I am
> insisting with this mode because I still think that it should be good
> for QRN (static crashes) conditions. Looking more closely at the
> issue, this mode takes far longer than the PSK modes to synchonize.
> Typically my client's fldigi would only get the synchronization right
> at the end of a short packet (in DominoEx11 mode). Solution may be to
> improve the sync speed in fldigi or alternatively add a sync string at
> the beggining like the old "rrrrrr" just for this mode. Rein, any
> suggestions? I am happy to change and test the code on the Pskmail
> side. 
>  
> 3. Some timing questions: when the client sends a packet and the
> server does not receive it properly, the timeout seems very long
> (roughly 10 to 15 seconds). Since it takes no more than 1 or 2 seconds
> for the server to start transmitting a frame would it be ok if the
> client waited say 4 seconds for an <SOH> character and assumed no
> reply? I have tried to change the client's timeout but it does not
> seem to alter this issue. Rein, how is this timeout calculated and
> where can I find the logic in the code? Thanks.
>  
> 4. I have updated my Mandriva distribution to the latest versions of
> Pskmail client and server. All functions work but when I do a Getpos
> from the client I get a "position unavailable" as a reply. I checked
> on findu and all the positions are updated correctly both in unproto
> and connected mode. What am I doing wrong? Where should I look for
> more detailed feedback on the server?
>  
> Otherwise had good success with this system. The CW filter I added
> last week in my server does help with the city QRM. I managed to
> linkup to the server on 40M with only the FT-817 bare at 5 watts with
> a dipole in the trees at 4 meters above ground. Right up to PSK250
> speed. QSB would affect 1 in 3 or 4 packets but it would get the job
> done at the end. Great stuff.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> John (VK2ETA)
>  
>  
>  
>  


Other related posts: