[pskmail] Re: Modes, comparison and usage

  • From: Pär Crusefalk <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:42:04 +0100

Great!

We should have some NVIS, fade, static and aurora in there too
eventually.
Here is  where I am at the moment:


Perhaps you can validate or correct that data through tests.

73 de Per, sm0rwo




sön 2010-01-24 klockan 16:59 +0100 skrev Rein Couperus:

> I will try to do some on-air measurements next week... I've got a nice clear 
> channel on 
> 18105 kHz where I can can work PI4TUE with 300 mW (PSK500) over a 20 km 
> path...
> 
> 73,
> 
> Rein PA0R
> 
> Hi,
> > 
> > As the list is not so busy at the moment I figured I could get some 
> > input for the manual. I would like to include a table in the manual 
> > where its easy to find data about and select a suitable mode for the 
> > current situation. I have started a table where I have filled in some 
> > of the data:
> > 
> > Are there other modes that belong there?
> > 
> > I would like to include some notes from the real world here, I mean 
> > like "not suitable for NVIS" and "excellent for stable bt weak 
> > signals".
> > 
> > The bps column can be tricky, many modes only talk about wpm and 
> > doesnt say what word they use (paris?).
> > Varicode makes it interesting too. 
> > 
> > Well, as the list is quiet I welcome any info you may have abt this 
> > interesting subject.
> > 
> > 73 de Per, sm0rwo
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 


Attachment: unknown-3QqOhG
Description: PNG image

Other related posts: