[pskmail] Re: Calling all pskmail servers in North America!- REAL TIME LIST

  • From: "DAVID GRAY" <kf4wbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:45:33 -0500

DOES THE REPORTER HAVE TO BE ON FREQUENCY ?
THE STANDARD SERVER IS NOT WHERE MOST PSKMAIL
ACTIVITY IS LIKE I THOUGHT THE REPORTER WAS COVERING AN AREA WHERE
MOST PSK QSO TAKE PLACE AND THEN ANYTHING INSIDE A CERTAIN SIZED
WINDOW IS REPORTED   I MEAN IT IS 10`S OF KHZ DIFFERENCE

DAVID / KF4WBS

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Rein Couperus" <rein@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 16:03
To: <pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [pskmail] Re: Calling all pskmail servers in North America!- REAL TIME LIST

I could easily add that, what is the format?

Rein DL/PA0R/M

On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:18:07 -0400
"Andrew O'Brien" <k3ukandy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I wonder if we could somehow mould PSK Reporter to provide a "real
time" map of active servers.  PSK Reporter has the advantage of having
a cadre of hams that use software that automatically upload reception
reports , this includes Fldigi and Multipsk.  I do not see ALL PSK
modes that PSKMAIL uses listed at PSK Reporter but I think we could
easily persuade Phil to add what we need.  Then, anyone looking for an
active list of servers might use PSK Reporter, select PSK250, and see
who is active.  We would need to have a quick visual method of
discerning the servers from the end users, but I am sure we can figure
that out.

Andy K3UK

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Per Crusefalk <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Yes, we do need that and there is a test in progress. For now sysops
> will have to update that wiki page. As you know we have a test where
> servers can post the scan table to a centralized page. One issue there
> is servers that require use of memory channels instead of frequencies.
> There will need to be a local conversion table for that. But, we are
> certainly going to have an automatic update of server status.
>
> 73 de Per
>
> ons 2011-08-10 klockan 10:43 -0500 skrev DAVID GRAY:
>> REIN
>>
>> ONE PROBLEM WITH THE LIST IS IT IS NOT CURRENT
>> THERE ARE SERVERS LISTED THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ON THE AIR IN A VERY LONG >> TIME
>> NETWORK ON THE AIR ONLY SHOWS 2 NORTH AMERICAN SERVERS OPERATING
>>
>> SOME OF THE SERVERS GO ON AND OFF BUT THEY ARE LISTED AS ON ALL >> THE
>> TIME
>> WE NEED SOMETHING A LITTLE MORE REAL-TIME BASED
>>
>> DAVID KF4WBS
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Per Crusefalk" <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 09:59
>> To: <pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [pskmail] Re: Calling all pskmail servers in North America!
>>
>> > Hi Gil,
>> >
>> > Good idea and there is a list available already. It's on this page >> > at
>> > the wiki: http://pskmail.wikispaces.com/PSKmailservers
>> > All server sysops should add their servers there and update the
>> > frequencies scanned etc. At the moment I see four servers in North
>> > America. That's actually much better than what I have seen in years >> > so
>> > we are getting better and better. This map displays all clients and
>> > servers except those that do not want to be seen (mostly MARS):
>> > http://hermes.esrac.ele.tue.nl/maps/pskmailers.php
>> >
>> > 73 de Per, sm0rwo
>> >
>> >
>> > ons 2011-08-10 klockan 07:38 -0500 skrev Gilbert Franke:
>> >> I would like to put together a list of pskmail servers in North
>> >> America.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> There may be such a list already; if someone knows of it, please >> >> let
>> >> me know.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If you are operating one, please send me the call, frequency, and
>> >> status.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I thought the aprs data at http://www.pskmail.it/ would show who is
>> >> on, but I've found out there are some that are not shown there.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> FYI -- WB5RFQ-5 is temporarily off the air with a computer problem.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 73, Gil WB5RFQ
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Gilbert A Franke
>> >> 361 442 6008 (cell)
>> >> 130 N Harris
>> >> Bellville TX  77418
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>



--
Rein Couperus <rein@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



Other related posts: