[pskmail] Re: Aw: Re: PSKmailservers in the Pacific

  • From: "DAVID GRAY" <kf4wbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:05:26 -0500

Maybe if pskmail had server to server rf only mail forwarding it would be a 
more favorable choice

David KF4WBS


From: Rein Couperus 
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 03:38
To: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: [pskmail] Aw: Re: PSKmailservers in the Pacific


Winlink(TM) requires a Micro$oft computer, and is the main cause of QRM on the 
HF bands...


Rein PA0R



Gesendet: Freitag, 27. April 2012 um 06:04 Uhr
Von: "Bernard Dekok" <kc9sgv@xxxxxxxxx>
An: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [pskmail] Re: PSKmailservers in the Pacific 
Christian,

Since crossing the Pacific is serious stuff, also look into Winmor as backup.
They have more servers and are more developed than PSKMail.
Sorry to be a traitor here, PSKMailers, but he will need some good service for 
weather data, email etc.
We need a better modem, more servers and faster thruput for PSKmail still.
Also a weather catalog and a propagation model.

See http://www.winlink.org/WINMOR

Also the Pacific Seafarer's Net
http://pacseanet.com/

KC9SGV


On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Christian Wagner <wagnerschristian@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

  Hi All,
  @ Robert- good to hear about the Filter and stuff- we will see how far
  we can do QSOs, ok?

  Right now we are scheduled to transit the Canal on the 2. of May- but
  with panamaian bureaucray that date is somewhat fuzzy. After that we
  need at least a week to buy provisions and outfit the boat for the
  Pacific crossing. So the new client isn't very urgent right now. It
  would be good though to test it once underway. However- what is really
  important is that i can revert back to the old client if the new
  client misses something critical in terms of functionality.

  Once under way I try to do position beacons twice a week or so.

  Thank you all for your efforts,
  Christian





Other related posts: