[projectaon] Re: Outstanding Errata Sprint (Week 6)
- From: Sam Seaver <samseaver@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:41:16 -0500
I've been following this conversation thread with interest, and I
wonder, can we actually just ask Joe himself?
Sam
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Timothy Pederick <pederick@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm seeing a fair bit of (what appears to me to be) arguing at
> cross-purposes. Since people said last time that my summary of the situation
> was helpful, I shall venture to do another one. This time, I'll just lay out
> the arguments that I think have been seriously proposed as people's
> preferred way of playing.
>
> The "Joe Dever got it wrong" argument.
>
> All bonuses for having Grand Weaponmastery with Bow should be +5.
> All instances of +3 (and that one ad hoc +4) should be changed.
>
> The "Grand Weaponmastery is intentionally worse" argument.
>
> The Grand Weaponmastery with Bow +3 is correct.
> Ad hoc +4 and +5 bonuses replace this.
> +3 and +4 are worse than a loyal reader's +5, so the loyal reader gets to
> use their +5 at all times.
>
> The "Grand Weaponmastery is the same as Weaponmastery" argument.
>
> Grand Weaponmastery with Bow +3 is correct.
> Ad hoc +4 and +5 bonuses replace this.
> A loyal reader who got the Mentora +2 (which is a subtly different bonus)
> can add that to Grand Weaponmastery, giving them a +5 (or ad hoc +6 or +7).
>
> Correct?
>
> --
> Tim Pederick
>
--
Postdoctoral Fellow
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Laboratory
9700 S. Cass Avenue
Argonne, IL 60439
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/sam-seaver/0/412/168
samseaver@xxxxxxxxx
~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
Other related posts:
