I actually just reinstalled Diablo II, pre expansion. no reason to buff the sorc though, sorc turns everything into quivering piles of shit and loot. Barbarian needs to be buffed--to slay immune to physical (aside from shitty berserk). On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > hey Nick (and Eric), are you guys playing the public test realm for > 1.13 in diablo 2? I am thinking of reinstalling just to mess around > on there, especially since you can set your level and skills at will. > > Also they buffed what I think was the best sorc build in the game, > quite oddly. (frozen orb + firewall) > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Nick Klotz <roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Best part about that letter is that it was in reply to a question by >> an 8 year old. I am betting he thought, "man I hope somebody explains >> what that means to me, for Christmas" >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> You broke my lol barrier. >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:40 AM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> shroedinger: is the cat alive or is it dead? there are two concurrent >>>> realities! >>>> us: hmm... what the hell are you talking about? what cat? >>>> shroedinger: the one in the box, you watched me put it in >>>> us: no we didn't >>>> shroedinger: fuck it, lets get a beer >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> hehe, by the way, read today's xkcd: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.xkcd.com >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > oh no, I feel it happening.. it's taking over everything! Poof! >>>>> > *becomes a singularity* >>>>> > >>>>> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:29 AM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >> quit trying to make santa disappear in a puff of logic! :) >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> But the real question is, if you observe Santa Claus, does he still >>>>> >>> exist? >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:14 AM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>> > "DEAR EDITOR: I am 8 years old. >>>>> >>> > "Some of my little friends say there is no Santa Claus. >>>>> >>> > "Papa says, 'If you see it in THE SUN it's so.' >>>>> >>> > "Please tell me the truth; is there a Santa Claus? >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > "VIRGINIA O'HANLON. >>>>> >>> > "115 WEST NINETY-FIFTH STREET." >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > VIRGINIA, your little friends are wrong. They have been affected by >>>>> >>> > the >>>>> >>> > skepticism of a skeptical age. They do not believe except [what] >>>>> >>> > they >>>>> >>> > see. >>>>> >>> > They think that nothing can be which is not comprehensible by their >>>>> >>> > little >>>>> >>> > minds. All minds, Virginia, whether they be men's or children's, are >>>>> >>> > little. >>>>> >>> > In this great universe of ours man is a mere insect, an ant, in his >>>>> >>> > intellect, as compared with the boundless world about him, as >>>>> >>> > measured >>>>> >>> > by >>>>> >>> > the intelligence capable of grasping the whole of truth and >>>>> >>> > knowledge. >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > Yes, VIRGINIA, there is a Santa Claus. He exists as certainly as >>>>> >>> > love >>>>> >>> > and >>>>> >>> > generosity and devotion exist, and you know that they abound and >>>>> >>> > give to >>>>> >>> > your life its highest beauty and joy. Alas! how dreary would be the >>>>> >>> > world if >>>>> >>> > there were no Santa Claus. It would be as dreary as if there were no >>>>> >>> > VIRGINIAS. There would be no childlike faith then, no poetry, no >>>>> >>> > romance >>>>> >>> > to >>>>> >>> > make tolerable this existence. We should have no enjoyment, except >>>>> >>> > in >>>>> >>> > sense >>>>> >>> > and sight. The eternal light with which childhood fills the world >>>>> >>> > would >>>>> >>> > be >>>>> >>> > extinguished. >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > Not believe in Santa Claus! You might as well not believe in >>>>> >>> > fairies! >>>>> >>> > You >>>>> >>> > might get your papa to hire men to watch in all the chimneys on >>>>> >>> > Christmas >>>>> >>> > Eve to catch Santa Claus, but even if they did not see Santa Claus >>>>> >>> > coming >>>>> >>> > down, what would that prove? Nobody sees Santa Claus, but that is no >>>>> >>> > sign >>>>> >>> > that there is no Santa Claus. The most real things in the world are >>>>> >>> > those >>>>> >>> > that neither children nor men can see. Did you ever see fairies >>>>> >>> > dancing >>>>> >>> > on >>>>> >>> > the lawn? Of course not, but that's no proof that they are not >>>>> >>> > there. >>>>> >>> > Nobody >>>>> >>> > can conceive or imagine all the wonders there are unseen and >>>>> >>> > unseeable >>>>> >>> > in >>>>> >>> > the world. >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > You may tear apart the baby's rattle and see what makes the noise >>>>> >>> > inside, >>>>> >>> > but there is a veil covering the unseen world which not the >>>>> >>> > strongest >>>>> >>> > man, >>>>> >>> > nor even the united strength of all the strongest men that ever >>>>> >>> > lived, >>>>> >>> > could >>>>> >>> > tear apart. Only faith, fancy, poetry, love, romance, can push aside >>>>> >>> > that >>>>> >>> > curtain and view and picture the supernal beauty and glory beyond. >>>>> >>> > Is it >>>>> >>> > all >>>>> >>> > real? Ah, VIRGINIA, in all this world there is nothing else real and >>>>> >>> > abiding. >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > No Santa Claus! Thank God! he lives, and he lives forever. A >>>>> >>> > thousand >>>>> >>> > years >>>>> >>> > from now, Virginia, nay, ten times ten thousand years from now, he >>>>> >>> > will >>>>> >>> > continue to make glad the heart of childhood. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >