[project1dev] Re: roger ebert
- From: Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:07:17 -0700
hehe funny (:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 8:26 AM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> By
> eric<http://blogs.suntimes.com/cgi-bin/mt-comments.cgi?__mode=red;id=692907>on
> May
> 13, 2009 9:51 AM <#121597b70aaa0b3a_comment-692907>
>
> here's why video games can (and occasionally are and will continue to) be
> art:
>
> Immersion. You're not watching a character on the screen, you are the
> character. It can be just another form of storytelling... one that engages
> the viewer directly.
>
> I imagine a day when the opening feature at Cannes is an interactive
> experience
>
> *Ebert: How will that work? Every audience member sees a different image?*
>
> *I believe video games will never be great art. Whether I'm right or
> wrong, video games are not movies. *
>
Other related posts:
