[project1dev] Re: massive wiki update

  • From: figarus@xxxxxxxxx
  • To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 23:43:58 +0000

Wow kent that was a lot of work so definitely big props to you there.

I think alan is right as far as putting the conclusions (like the "official" 
systems) up but I will probably have to plow through and edit to pick our stuff 
and even then, cutting room floor stuff could be retained in its own section so 
we can reference it.  Kent definitely established a basis for us to work on and 
I am sure it was a lot of work so again, awesome :)

On a side note, alan have you heard from katie? Me and chris were gonna start 
divying up art tasks and setting a deadline (I work 100% better under pressure 
:P) so we can get our part of the cave cranked out.

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 16:24:47 
To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [project1dev] Re: massive wiki update

well, i dont think that would help...

it's a wiki, its meant to hold data like this.

it should be enough on it's own :P

it's even searchable
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Nick Klotz <roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> haha, I don't need as ANOTHER place to put ideas, but rather, a physical
> representation of the logical build on how to organize. Sometimes it's
> better to see... kinda like building a flow chart (:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> no, it wont help, the last thing we need is another place to put ideas!!!
>> :P
>>   On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Nick Klotz <roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>> I wonder if I can still program a small database or build a logical
>>> construct of data organization with the software on my computer to help
>>> organize stuff. hm
>>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Plus, I'm not really sure how to organize it
>>>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>> I totally agree with you but the information was tossed around so
>>>>> randomly i just collected it first. The second pass will be to minimize 
>>>>> and
>>>>> make sense of the crap that's up there. My end goal is to have it for 
>>>>> quick
>>>>> reference on our ideas
>>>>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>> I havent checked it out yet, but i'd say we want to keep information
>>>>>> on the wiki minimal.
>>>>>> Too much crap up there and it will be too hard to figure out what is
>>>>>> what.
>>>>>> Like instead of putting up whole convos just put up the conclusion.
>>>>>> like...
>>>>>> Handling Death
>>>>>> 1) When an npc dies, they can be recovered from any spirit node and
>>>>>> are still injured
>>>>>> 2) When all npc's and the player are dead, it loads the last save game
>>>>>> 3) When you visit spirit nodes it does an auto-save so if you die
>>>>>> you'll be taken back to the last spirit node you visited at very least.
>>>>>> Have that instead of the millions of lines of conversation it took to
>>>>>> get us there :P
>>>>>> less is more deffinately here, we want info to be short, concise, and
>>>>>> easy to find and understand (:
>>>>>>   On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>> Ok, I went through all of my emails and compiled everything and
>>>>>>> posted it on the wiki. It's very disorganized and mostly copy n paste
>>>>>>> quotes. I hope Eric will go through most of what he said and clean it 
>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>> I'm hoping that everyone will update the wiki with stuff they think is
>>>>>>> important as we go so there won't need to be a massive update again. 
>>>>>>> Anyone
>>>>>>> is welcome to move around any info as they see fit. My organizational 
>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>> is inconsistant and hard to follow. Plus this is the first wiki I've 
>>>>>>> ever
>>>>>>> tried to make. Feedback and criticizm is welcome

Other related posts: