[project1dev] Re: massive wiki update

  • From: Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 16:47:57 -0700

Thanks I will try to clean up the wiki and I'll start with what I know. Just
now, I cleaned up the cave section quite a bit. I also cleaned up the
milestone section.

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:43 PM, <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Wow kent that was a lot of work so definitely big props to you there.
>
> I think alan is right as far as putting the conclusions (like the
> "official" systems) up but I will probably have to plow through and edit to
> pick our stuff and even then, cutting room floor stuff could be retained in
> its own section so we can reference it. Kent definitely established a basis
> for us to work on and I am sure it was a lot of work so again, awesome :)
>
> On a side note, alan have you heard from katie? Me and chris were gonna
> start divying up art tasks and setting a deadline (I work 100% better under
> pressure :P) so we can get our part of the cave cranked out.
>
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: Alan Wolfe
> *Date*: Tue, 5 May 2009 16:24:47 -0700
> *To*: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: [project1dev] Re: massive wiki update
> well, i dont think that would help...
>
> it's a wiki, its meant to hold data like this.
>
> it should be enough on it's own :P
>
> it's even searchable
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Nick Klotz <roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> haha, I don't need as ANOTHER place to put ideas, but rather, a physical
>> representation of the logical build on how to organize. Sometimes it's
>> better to see... kinda like building a flow chart (:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> no, it wont help, the last thing we need is another place to put ideas!!!
>>> :P
>>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Nick Klotz <roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I wonder if I can still program a small database or build a logical
>>>> construct of data organization with the software on my computer to help
>>>> organize stuff. hm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Plus, I'm not really sure how to organize it
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I totally agree with you but the information was tossed around so
>>>>>> randomly i just collected it first. The second pass will be to minimize 
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> make sense of the crap that's up there. My end goal is to have it for 
>>>>>> quick
>>>>>> reference on our ideas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I havent checked it out yet, but i'd say we want to keep information
>>>>>>> on the wiki minimal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Too much crap up there and it will be too hard to figure out what is
>>>>>>> what.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like instead of putting up whole convos just put up the conclusion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> like...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Handling Death
>>>>>>> 1) When an npc dies, they can be recovered from any spirit node and
>>>>>>> are still injured
>>>>>>> 2) When all npc's and the player are dead, it loads the last save
>>>>>>> game
>>>>>>> 3) When you visit spirit nodes it does an auto-save so if you die
>>>>>>> you'll be taken back to the last spirit node you visited at very least.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have that instead of the millions of lines of conversation it took to
>>>>>>> get us there :P
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> less is more deffinately here, we want info to be short, concise, and
>>>>>>> easy to find and understand (:
>>>>>>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ok, I went through all of my emails and compiled everything and
>>>>>>>> posted it on the wiki. It's very disorganized and mostly copy n paste
>>>>>>>> quotes. I hope Eric will go through most of what he said and clean it 
>>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>> I'm hoping that everyone will update the wiki with stuff they think is
>>>>>>>> important as we go so there won't need to be a massive update again. 
>>>>>>>> Anyone
>>>>>>>> is welcome to move around any info as they see fit. My organizational 
>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>> is inconsistant and hard to follow. Plus this is the first wiki I've 
>>>>>>>> ever
>>>>>>>> tried to make. Feedback and criticizm is welcome
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Other related posts: