btw i was just teasing if any of you are fans of ff8... to be honest i never even played it On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:05 PM, <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Square just went after a different audience with ff7 on and left us > oldschool kids in the dust > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:00:00 > To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [project1dev] Re: duke nukem forever > > > I loved 7 so 8 and 9 kinda let me down, and I never played any of them > after that (tho I wanted to) > > I did really like 9 though, it felt oldschool. > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:57 PM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > dont lie matthew, i remember you playing it!! but yeah you were like 11 > :P > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Matthew Morgan <MMorgan@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> > >> Worst FF ever=-( > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> From: project1dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> [mailto:project1dev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of eric drewes > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:20 PM > >> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: [project1dev] Re: duke nukem forever > >> > >> > >> > >> square died for me w/ the release of ff8 > >> > >> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx> > >> wrote: > >> > >> I would totally hope for their work to get released officially by > >> Square (like Team Fortress 2 was with Valve) but they should have just > >> given the guys job offers instead of "omg fine 150k" > >> > >> But even that release on the ds was so basic without any additions, it > >> probably didn't make a lot of money. They should have just released > >> Radical Dreamers here instead... I don't understand them :/ > >> > >> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Nick Klotz <roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> > they probably had an insider go OMG THIS IS AWESOME. Stole the work > and > >> > is > >> > gonna give it to square enix... who wants to bet they'll come out with > a > >> > chronotrigger game in the next 2 years? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Chris Sherman > >> > <cshermandesign@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Yeah we will say that now, once we have our 18 cars and 40+ mansions > we > >> >> might change ;p lol nah but seriously its retarded. How much money do > >> >> you > >> >> think chrono trigger is making Square Enix now a days? 15 dollars a > >> >> year > >> >> would be my guess. > >> >> > >> >> Sent from my BlackBerry > >> >> > >> >>________________________________ > >> >> From: eric drewes > >> >> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 15:56:13 -0400 > >> >> To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> Subject: [project1dev] Re: duke nukem forever > >> >> i dont get it, when we're a big name gaming company, we should > totally > >> >> support and encourage fan stuff :) > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx > > > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> That would almost be one of the best fan games ever Eric :P > >> >>> > >> >>> did you guys see about Square Enix sending a cease and desist letter > >> >>> to a rom hack team that was working on a Chrono Trigger fan game? > >> >>> > >> >>> http://www.chronocompendium.com > >> >>> > >> >>> This dude and his team spent 5 years on and off on it.. and right > >> >>> before release they got slammed with a legal threat :( > >> >>> > >> >>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:41 PM, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > me and david were talking about it, they should just release what > >> >>> > they > >> >>> > have > >> >>> > w/ the source so fans can finish it... > >> >>> > > >> >>> > lol... like the dead hero is brought back to life by the fans who > >> >>> > never > >> >>> > gave > >> >>> > up on him :) > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx > > > >> >>> > wrote: > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> http://games.ign.com/articles/981/981284p1.html > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> :P > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >>________________________________ > >> > >> > >> > ******************************************************************************************************************************************************************* > >> > >> This e-mail is the property of Oakley Inc. It is intended only for the > >> person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information > that > >> is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. > >> Distribution or copying of this e-mail, or the information contained > herein, > >> to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. > > > > > >