Wait, is Liz hot? Because I'm all for a 3 way! heh --- On Fri, 7/17/09, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [project1dev] Re: Temple Update [Informative] > To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Friday, July 17, 2009, 5:32 PM > No I meant Eric, insinuating that > liz and I were lesbians and were doing dirty things. > > Don't go giving sid any ideas now guys? I got him > corralled up pretty well so far...=) > > BTW, I don't have to fake w/Sid, but most guys I > did. =) TMI probably, sorry guys > --- On Fri, 7/17/09, Nick Klotz > <roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Nick Klotz <roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [project1dev] Re: Temple Update [Informative] > To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Friday, July 17, 2009, 5:30 PM > > > Am I the bastard because I'm > saying don't fake unless you're a porn star? :( > > I'm sorry Katie. If a guy is REALLY bad in bed > and you just want him to stop, you can fake. > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 7:27 PM, > katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > > you bastard!....=) > > > --- On Fri, 7/17/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [project1dev] Re: Temple Update [Informative] > To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Friday, July 17, 2009, 5:15 PM > > > > > > can i watch? > > > oops, sorry sid jk'ing!! > > > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:13 PM, > katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, I though liz and I got a thing > going.... > > --- On Fri, 7/17/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Subject: [project1dev] Re: Temple Update [Informative] > To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Friday, July 17, 2009, 5:11 PM > > > > > > re: stepping on toes, i just meant i didnt want to > give you the full greenlight to do as you please when katie > and elizabeth already have had some progress in the > direction for the beast. > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:05 PM, > Chris Sherman <cshermandesign@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I just want to defend eric in saying > what he said. Direction works well, he's busy working on > things I'm sure and doesn't have time to fill me in > with fine details especially when its already been posted. > Its my fault I haven't been following the project as > closely as I would like to, I don't want people to fight > but at the same time if shit needs said then say it. I hate > it when people try to be polite to avoid "stepping on > toes". If something needs said than it should be said > as long as it has a point to it > Sent from my BlackBerry > > > From: eric drewes > Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:58:48 -0400 > > > > To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [project1dev] Re: Temple Update > [Informative] > > > > > ok i take that back - but i refuse to work with asdf > any further. sick of him not knowing what he is > talking about at all and still feeling entitled like he can > be critical of other people. > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 7:56 PM, > eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > i quit. > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 7:50 PM, > Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > i think we are tilting at windmills > > people have stuff to work on, we are working towards a > common goal > > wheres the problem? I dont see people working on > any useless tasks do you? > > It's not like nick is trying to build the temple > and everyone else is off on the next milestone stuff. > > Eric let people know what they should be working on > and everyone is working on the right stuff. > > the fact that you or I dont know what people are > working on doesnt mean it isnt organized, it just means we > don't know :P > > > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:48 PM, > Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I did say that once yes. It's > true too, people will do things much > more easily once they know what they're doing very > clearly and know it > will be productive. > > If you know what you're doing, then you need to share > it with others, > instead of just saying things will get done at some > indeterminate time > in the future ;p > > By the way it would help Sherman if you, as the art team > head, > actually gave him input on what to do with the beast > instead of just > telling him to email Liz and Katie about it. > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:31 PM, <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Seriously chris you repeat this "they just need > to know what to do, but no one is helping them with > that" message often but it has no basis in fact :P > > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:26:49 > > To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: [project1dev] Re: Temple Update > [Informative] > > > > > > That's good to hear about Alex. I don't > know about Sherman, it seems > > > more like he just wasn't assigned anything so he > didn't chime in. I > > know a lot more people read the list than post to it, > just because > > they aren't as active in current things. > > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:21 PM, <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> Chris sherman hasn't checked in or > participated in a cpl months so I would consider him MIA... > Katie is an option but she's been busy w/ other art... > I've been really happy w/ the progress alex has made :) > just an fyi > >> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:18:39 > >> To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Subject: [project1dev] Re: Temple Update > [Informative] > >> > >> > >> This is a great overview Nick, thanks a lot for > posting it. All I can > >> think of input wise is to tell you not to forget > about the rest of the > >> art team - Chris Sherman and Katie have been > making excellent art, and > >> from the looks of your list of requested art > you're going to need all > >> the hands you can get. Getting everyone > involved is definitely a > >> plus. If you feel like Alex can take care of > what you need tho, by > >> all means. > >> > >> What Alan said about being in sync is a great > point, giving us a heads > >> up like this is really helpful :) > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Nick > Klotz<roracsenshi@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >>> I've read a lot recently about confusion > on where the temple stands and > >>> what's next and who's doing what, so > here's a break down as I know it. > >>> > >>> DESIGN - I am solely working on the > functional design of the temple. > >>> Status - > >>> First floor [COMPLETE] > >>> Basement - All I have to do is place the > elevator shaft, the functional > >>> design is [COMPLETE] > >>> Maze - 35% complete > >>> Ceiling Trap Room - 0% complete [ small but > complex ] > >>> Beast Room - 0% complete [ undecided ] > >>> > >>> By COMPLETE I mean the functional layout > only. Scripting for traps, > >>> placement of traps, and art is not > finished. > >>> > >>> SCRIPTS - Kent is doing the vast majority of > all the scripting for traps, > >>> puzzles, and room entrances and exits for the > entire temple. > >>> Status - Uncomplete > >>> Needs - A lot of work (Kent and I will > communicate as necessary on this) > >>> > >>> ART - Alex is working with me on the following > objects, Alex and Eric please > >>> correct me if any of this is wrong > >>> Succubus > >>> Injured Man > >>> Treasure > >>> Pillars > >>> Textures for floors and walls > >>> Spiked log > >>> Torches > >>> > >>> Other art - Beast temple, Old man > >>> Anything additional I think I will want or > need I will discuss with Eric and > >>> upon his approval, post it to the necessary > people. > >>> Status - Incomplete > >>> Needs - A > lot of work (and work current finished objects to be > checked in) > >>> > >>> > >>> Any other questions or concerns about the > temple please let me know! I am > >>> also open to suggestions, constructive > critism, etc, so if anyone has ideas > >>> as always feel free to pitch them! Though the > closer I get to completion the > >>> less likely it will be that things will be > changed. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >