[project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK BEAST
- From: Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:38:55 -0700
The way I see it, the concept art is just a template to go off of, and if it
would work better in 3D to change things, then the 3D artist shouldn't feel
limited by what's in the 2D concept.
Basically what I'm saying is that I'm not going to be butthurt if things are
changed between my design and the final product- that would sort of defeat
the whole purpose of working as a team.
If all goes well, tonight I'll have my scanner/tablet hooked up and I can
start scanning the other sketches and slopping colors on.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Chris Riccobono <crysalim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I like the pictures for the beast, we should just go forward and tweak
> it if we don't like it, perhaps.
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Alan Wolfe<alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > yeah you know it's strange. I am not real clear on how concept art
> becomes
> > 3d models, because it's diff people that do the concept art vs the real
> > stuff.
> >
> > I'll ask some artist buddies if there's anything more to it than "meh,
> you
> > just try to follow the style where you can" or something hehe
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:43 AM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think 3.0 works with the sketch you did, I can work from that.
> >>
> >> Granted it would be subject to my artistic interpretation of
> portrayal...
> >> What I mean really is:
> >> You could give a few different people the same exact concept and they
> >> would all built/model it slightly different. With the models I have been
> >> doing personally I have been coming up with colors/look, so I am cool
> with
> >> doing that unless colors/design is something that they guys want
> done with
> >> the concept...?
> >>
> >> If everyone agrees it is cool to go ahead with it, then I can start
> >> modeling after I finish the wagon if EROCK is cool with that. I haven't
> >> checked in with Eric as far as what is up next after we finish the
> fortune
> >> teller area. That might affect it. Need to make sure to stick with his
> >> production schedule..=)
> >>
> >> Anyway, let me know guys what you think and how we are looking schedule
> >> wise...
> >>
> >> I have an extra day this weekend to work on the project so I am hoping I
> >> can get some things wrapped up!
> >>
> >>
> >> --- On Thu, 7/9/09, Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK
> >> BEAST
> >> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 11:19 PM
> >>
> >> Okay, I'll work up some more designs along the lines of 3.0, different
> >> angles and whatnot.
> >> I hadn't realized that 2.0 looked like the Armored Bears...I was just
> >> going for something bulkier and more muscular than 1.0. I guess I need
> to
> >> be more careful about those subconscious influences!
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I agree with you Katie. I think keeping away form mainstream stuff is a
> >>> good idea. I like the way 3.0 looks more anyway
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I am a big fan of biobeastie 3.0, that is much along the lines of what
> I
> >>>> was thinking, but was not able to concept. I suck at concept drawing,
> >>>> etc...=(
> >>>>
> >>>> Biobeastie 2.0 reminds me a lot of the polar bears with their armor in
> >>>> The golden compass. I think it is a neat idea, but I think it would be
> >>>> easily distinguishable and seen as too similar to those characters.
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you guys think? I am just shooting from left field here...=)
> >>>>
> >>>> --- On Thu, 7/9/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE
> STEAMPUNK
> >>>> BEAST
> >>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 2:03 PM
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I've attached the two more concepts I've come up with- biobeastie 2.0
> >>>> was done after people suggested a more biological and less mechanical
> look
> >>>> to the beastie, and 3.0 was done with the steampunk idea in mind.
> Please
> >>>> forgive my ghetto color coding, all I had to color with was a couple
> of
> >>>> highlighters (hooray for slacking at work!). The green bits are
> >>>> fluids/tubes/wires, the yellow is for brains/veins/biological bits,
> and the
> >>>> shaded silver parts are all metal.
> >>>>
> >>>> These are rough concepts. Once we agree on a general shape/build for
> >>>> the beast, I can work up detailed images with different views and
> proper
> >>>> colors.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:25 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I might be modeling it, it depends on if I get the go ahead from
> Eric
> >>>>>> and if no one else was slotted to model it. I have only been doing
> props up
> >>>>>> to this point, and there are some other peeps that have been
> handling
> >>>>>> characters, etc. I want to make sure they are cool with it first.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I just had some really basic ideas. You should post what you got. It
> >>>>>> could be very similar to what you had in mind. =) Maybe I could add
> on to
> >>>>>> what you have already worked out...?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --- On Wed, 7/8/09, Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> From: Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE
> >>>>>> STEAMPUNK BEAST
> >>>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 4:34 PM
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'd love to see your concepts as well, Katie, especially since
> you're
> >>>>>> going to be the one modeling it. What did you have in mind?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:58 PM, <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If you two want to work together that would be awesome, I'd like to
> >>>>>>> see what sketches concept wise you come up wqoith
> >>>>>>> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
> >>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>> From: katie cook
> >>>>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
> >>>>>>> To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE
> >>>>>>> STEAMPUNK BEAST
> >>>>>>> Yeah, that would be cool.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I would be interested in modeling it, but that would all be up to
> >>>>>>> Eric and what he wants done...=)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --- On Wed, 7/8/09, Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> From: Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE
> >>>>>>> STEAMPUNK BEAST
> >>>>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 1:50 PM
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm working on concepts still. I was MIA for a week because I was
> >>>>>>> down in LA, but I can finish the ideas I've got if you guys are
> ready to
> >>>>>>> start modeling it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Just putting this in if someone misses it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
Other related posts:
