I like the pictures for the beast, we should just go forward and tweak it if we don't like it, perhaps. On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Alan Wolfe<alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > yeah you know it's strange. I am not real clear on how concept art becomes > 3d models, because it's diff people that do the concept art vs the real > stuff. > > I'll ask some artist buddies if there's anything more to it than "meh, you > just try to follow the style where you can" or something hehe > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:43 AM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I think 3.0 works with the sketch you did, I can work from that. >> >> Granted it would be subject to my artistic interpretation of portrayal... >> What I mean really is: >> You could give a few different people the same exact concept and they >> would all built/model it slightly different. With the models I have been >> doing personally I have been coming up with colors/look, so I am cool with >> doing that unless colors/design is something that they guys want done with >> the concept...? >> >> If everyone agrees it is cool to go ahead with it, then I can start >> modeling after I finish the wagon if EROCK is cool with that. I haven't >> checked in with Eric as far as what is up next after we finish the fortune >> teller area. That might affect it. Need to make sure to stick with his >> production schedule..=) >> >> Anyway, let me know guys what you think and how we are looking schedule >> wise... >> >> I have an extra day this weekend to work on the project so I am hoping I >> can get some things wrapped up! >> >> >> --- On Thu, 7/9/09, Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> From: Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK >> BEAST >> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 11:19 PM >> >> Okay, I'll work up some more designs along the lines of 3.0, different >> angles and whatnot. >> I hadn't realized that 2.0 looked like the Armored Bears...I was just >> going for something bulkier and more muscular than 1.0. I guess I need to >> be more careful about those subconscious influences! >> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> I agree with you Katie. I think keeping away form mainstream stuff is a >>> good idea. I like the way 3.0 looks more anyway >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> I am a big fan of biobeastie 3.0, that is much along the lines of what I >>>> was thinking, but was not able to concept. I suck at concept drawing, >>>> etc...=( >>>> >>>> Biobeastie 2.0 reminds me a lot of the polar bears with their armor in >>>> The golden compass. I think it is a neat idea, but I think it would be >>>> easily distinguishable and seen as too similar to those characters. >>>> >>>> What do you guys think? I am just shooting from left field here...=) >>>> >>>> --- On Thu, 7/9/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK >>>> BEAST >>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 2:03 PM >>>> >>>> >>>> I've attached the two more concepts I've come up with- biobeastie 2.0 >>>> was done after people suggested a more biological and less mechanical look >>>> to the beastie, and 3.0 was done with the steampunk idea in mind. Please >>>> forgive my ghetto color coding, all I had to color with was a couple of >>>> highlighters (hooray for slacking at work!). The green bits are >>>> fluids/tubes/wires, the yellow is for brains/veins/biological bits, and the >>>> shaded silver parts are all metal. >>>> >>>> These are rough concepts. Once we agree on a general shape/build for >>>> the beast, I can work up detailed images with different views and proper >>>> colors. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:25 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I might be modeling it, it depends on if I get the go ahead from Eric >>>>>> and if no one else was slotted to model it. I have only been doing props >>>>>> up >>>>>> to this point, and there are some other peeps that have been handling >>>>>> characters, etc. I want to make sure they are cool with it first. >>>>>> >>>>>> I just had some really basic ideas. You should post what you got. It >>>>>> could be very similar to what you had in mind. =) Maybe I could add on to >>>>>> what you have already worked out...? >>>>>> >>>>>> --- On Wed, 7/8/09, Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE >>>>>> STEAMPUNK BEAST >>>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 4:34 PM >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd love to see your concepts as well, Katie, especially since you're >>>>>> going to be the one modeling it. What did you have in mind? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:58 PM, <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you two want to work together that would be awesome, I'd like to >>>>>>> see what sketches concept wise you come up wqoith >>>>>>> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile >>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>> From: katie cook >>>>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:54:49 -0700 (PDT) >>>>>>> To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE >>>>>>> STEAMPUNK BEAST >>>>>>> Yeah, that would be cool. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would be interested in modeling it, but that would all be up to >>>>>>> Eric and what he wants done...=) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- On Wed, 7/8/09, Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE >>>>>>> STEAMPUNK BEAST >>>>>>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 1:50 PM >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm working on concepts still. I was MIA for a week because I was >>>>>>> down in LA, but I can finish the ideas I've got if you guys are ready to >>>>>>> start modeling it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just putting this in if someone misses it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > >