[project1dev] Re: Fwd: Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK BEAST
- From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:30:27 -0800 (PST)
NOPE, I call dibs on the biobeastie. =)
Thanks Guys! I just thought liz wanted to rework the concept before I started,
but if I misunderstood and she is ready then I will use the concept that is
approved. You guys might have reposted. Haven't dug through all the emails
yet...I will look to see if it is there.
Thx
katie
--- On Sun, 11/15/09, gabriel taylor <aidyn66@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: gabriel taylor <aidyn66@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [project1dev] Re: Fwd: Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE
STEAMPUNK BEAST
To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sunday, November 15, 2009, 12:42 PM
I haven't seen any of the concept work for the beast, and I was under
the impression Katie was going to be working on it. I'd be interested,
though, if you'd like me to. Just let me know where the concept work
is, and I'll check it out. I'll probably add some questions there, too.
Me and my questions.... :P
Elizabeth Patrician wrote:
> Whats her noodle being me, of course...
> I was under the impression that the beast was approved and that
> Gabriel was going to model the beast based on the concepts that I had
> already done? I'm very sorry if it's become a point of contention
> because of my misunderstanding, should I still be reworking it?
> Liz
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:34 AM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> After this event, there were posts about modifications and color
> concepts etc that whats her noodle wanted to change...
>
>
> --- On *Sun, 11/15/09, eric drewes /<figarus@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:figarus@xxxxxxxxx>>/* wrote:
>
>
> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:figarus@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [project1dev] Fwd: Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON
> THE STEAMPUNK BEAST
> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sunday, November 15, 2009, 10:01 AM
>
>
> "And I hear its been approved that I can work on the
> biobeastie thing, but where the heck are the concepts. Has
> anyone finished that? Is it already finished? What needs to be
> done? If it is ready to be modeled, post the final concept and
> Mark it FINAL CONCEPT or something to indicate as such, and I
> will get on it! And if you still want help with character
> designs, let me know. Just a description or something to go
> from and we can shoot back and forth until we reach a point
> that your happy with."
>
>
> *HERE YOU GO:*
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *katie cook* <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx
> <http://mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:43 PM
> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE
> STEAMPUNK BEAST
> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <http://mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> I think 3.0 works with the sketch you did, I can work from that.
>
> Granted it would be subject to my artistic interpretation of
> portrayal...
> What I mean really is:
> You could give a few different people the same exact concept
> and they would all built/model it slightly different. With the
> models I have been doing personally I have been coming up with
> colors/look, so I am cool with doing that unless colors/design
> is something that they guys want done with the concept...?
>
> If everyone agrees it is cool to go ahead with it, then I can
> start modeling after I finish the wagon if EROCK is cool with
> that. I haven't checked in with Eric as far as what is up next
> after we finish the fortune teller area. That might affect it.
> Need to make sure to stick with his production schedule..=)
>
> Anyway, let me know guys what you think and how we are looking
> schedule wise...
>
> I have an extra day this weekend to work on the project so I
> am hoping I can get some things wrapped up!
>
>
>
> --- On *Thu, 7/9/09, Elizabeth Patrician /<potatoart@xxxxxxxxx
> <http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>>/* wrote:
>
>
> From: Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx
> <http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON
> THE STEAMPUNK BEAST
> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <http://mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 11:19 PM
>
>
> Okay, I'll work up some more designs along the lines of
> 3.0, different angles and whatnot.
> I hadn't realized that 2.0 looked like the Armored
> Bears...I was just going for something bulkier and more
> muscular than 1.0. I guess I need to be more careful
> about those subconscious influences!
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Kent Petersen
> <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx
> <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx>>
> wrote:
>
> I agree with you Katie. I think keeping away form
> mainstream stuff is a good idea. I like the way 3.0
> looks more anyway
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM, katie cook
> <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx
>
> <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>>
> wrote:
>
> I am a big fan of biobeastie 3.0, that is much
> along the lines of what I was thinking, but was
> not able to concept. I suck at concept drawing,
> etc...=(
>
> Biobeastie 2.0 reminds me a lot of the polar bears
> with their armor in The golden compass. I think it
> is a neat idea, but I think it would be easily
> distinguishable and seen as too similar to those
> characters.
>
> What do you guys think? I am just shooting from
> left field here...=)
>
> --- On *Thu, 7/9/09, eric drewes
> /<figarus@xxxxxxxxx
>
> <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=figarus@xxxxxxxxx>>/*
> wrote:
>
>
> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx
>
> <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=figarus@xxxxxxxxx>>
>
>
> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR
> WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK BEAST
> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 2:03 PM
>
>
>
> I've attached the two more concepts I've come
> up with- biobeastie 2.0 was done after people
> suggested a more biological and less
> mechanical look to the beastie, and 3.0 was
> done with the steampunk idea in mind. Please
> forgive my ghetto color coding, all I had to
> color with was a couple of highlighters
> (hooray for slacking at work!). The green
> bits are fluids/tubes/wires, the yellow is for
> brains/veins/biological bits, and the shaded
> silver parts are all metal.
>
> These are rough concepts. Once we agree on a
> general shape/build for the beast, I can work
> up detailed images with different views and
> proper colors.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:25 PM, katie cook
> <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx
> <http://mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>>
> wrote:
>
> I might be modeling it, it depends on
> if I get the go ahead from Eric and if
> no one else was slotted to model it. I
> have only been doing props up to this
> point, and there are some other peeps
> that have been handling characters,
> etc. I want to make sure they are cool
> with it first.
>
> I just had some really basic ideas.
> You should post what you got. It could
> be very similar to what you had in
> mind. =) Maybe I could add on to what
> you have already worked out...?
>
>
> --- On *Wed, 7/8/09, Elizabeth
> Patrician /<potatoart@xxxxxxxxx
> <http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>>/*
> wrote:
>
>
> From: Elizabeth Patrician
> <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx
>
> <http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE
> POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE
> STEAMPUNK BEAST
> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> <http://mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2009,
> 4:34 PM
>
>
> I'd love to see your concepts as
> well, Katie, especially since
> you're going to be the one
> modeling it. What did you have in
> mind?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:58 PM,
> <figarus@xxxxxxxxx
>
> <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=figarus@xxxxxxxxx>>
> wrote:
>
> If you two want to work
> together that would be
> awesome, I'd like to see what
> sketches concept wise you come
> up wqoith
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From*: katie cook
> *Date*: Wed, 8 Jul 2009
> 13:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
> *To*:
> <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>
>
> *Subject*: [project1dev] Re:
> PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON
> THE STEAMPUNK BEAST
> Yeah, that would be cool.
>
> I would be interested in
> modeling it, but that would
> all be up to Eric and what he
> wants done...=)
>
> --- On *Wed, 7/8/09, Elizabeth
> Patrician
> /<potatoart@xxxxxxxxx
>
> <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>>/*
> wrote:
>
>
> From: Elizabeth Patrician
> <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx
>
> <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [project1dev] Re:
> PLEASE POST IF YOUR
> WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK BEAST
> To:
> project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, July 8,
> 2009, 1:50 PM
>
> I'm working on concepts
> still. I was MIA for a
> week because I was down in
> LA, but I can finish the
> ideas I've got if you guys
> are ready to start
> modeling it.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at
> 1:26 PM, katie cook
> <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx
>
> <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>>
> wrote:
>
> Just putting this in
> if someone misses it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
