[project1dev] Re: Fwd: Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK BEAST
- From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:53:13 -0500
the concept art for the beast is approved, i don't really care who models it
but i would say katie has dibs because she had it first, however if she
wants to defer to you that is fine - if you have any questions post them for
the group or you can email me directly and i can answer!
as far as contentions go, i think basically people are frustrated by a lack
of progress, we had a major problem as far as managing the project goes that
hopefully is in the process of being rectified so really don't worry about
it! I really like everyone on the team and i think we can do great thing
and i feel responsible for slowness but have taken steps to fix the issue...
hopefully we'll have smooth sailing now.
thanks,
eric
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 3:42 PM, gabriel taylor <aidyn66@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I haven't seen any of the concept work for the beast, and I was under the
> impression Katie was going to be working on it. I'd be interested, though,
> if you'd like me to. Just let me know where the concept work is, and I'll
> check it out. I'll probably add some questions there, too. Me and my
> questions.... :P
>
> Elizabeth Patrician wrote:
>
>> Whats her noodle being me, of course...
>> I was under the impression that the beast was approved and that Gabriel
>> was going to model the beast based on the concepts that I had already done?
>> I'm very sorry if it's become a point of contention because of my
>> misunderstanding, should I still be reworking it?
>> Liz
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:34 AM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:
>> ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>> After this event, there were posts about modifications and color
>> concepts etc that whats her noodle wanted to change...
>>
>>
>> --- On *Sun, 11/15/09, eric drewes /<figarus@xxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:figarus@xxxxxxxxx>>/* wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:figarus@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>
>> Subject: [project1dev] Fwd: Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON
>> THE STEAMPUNK BEAST
>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Date: Sunday, November 15, 2009, 10:01 AM
>>
>>
>> "And I hear its been approved that I can work on the
>> biobeastie thing, but where the heck are the concepts. Has
>> anyone finished that? Is it already finished? What needs to be
>> done? If it is ready to be modeled, post the final concept and
>> Mark it FINAL CONCEPT or something to indicate as such, and I
>> will get on it! And if you still want help with character
>> designs, let me know. Just a description or something to go
>> from and we can shoot back and forth until we reach a point
>> that your happy with."
>>
>>
>> *HERE YOU GO:*
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: *katie cook* <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx
>> <http://mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>>
>> Date: Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:43 PM
>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE
>> STEAMPUNK BEAST
>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <http://mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>> I think 3.0 works with the sketch you did, I can work from that.
>> Granted it would be subject to my artistic interpretation
>> of
>> portrayal...
>> What I mean really is:
>> You could give a few different people the same exact concept
>> and they would all built/model it slightly different. With the
>> models I have been doing personally I have been coming up with
>> colors/look, so I am cool with doing that unless colors/design
>> is something that they guys want done with the concept...?
>> If everyone agrees it is cool to go ahead with it, then I
>> can
>> start modeling after I finish the wagon if EROCK is cool with
>> that. I haven't checked in with Eric as far as what is up next
>> after we finish the fortune teller area. That might affect it.
>> Need to make sure to stick with his production schedule..=)
>> Anyway, let me know guys what you think and how we are
>> looking
>> schedule wise...
>> I have an extra day this weekend to work on the project so
>> I
>> am hoping I can get some things wrapped up!
>>
>>
>> --- On *Thu, 7/9/09, Elizabeth Patrician /<potatoart@xxxxxxxxx
>> <http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>>/* wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx
>> <http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>
>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON
>> THE STEAMPUNK BEAST
>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <http://mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 11:19 PM
>>
>>
>> Okay, I'll work up some more designs along the lines of
>> 3.0, different angles and whatnot.
>> I hadn't realized that 2.0 looked like the Armored
>> Bears...I was just going for something bulkier and more
>> muscular than 1.0. I guess I need to be more careful
>> about those subconscious influences!
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Kent Petersen
>> <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx
>> <
>> http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I agree with you Katie. I think keeping away form
>> mainstream stuff is a good idea. I like the way 3.0
>> looks more anyway
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM, katie cook
>> <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx
>> <
>> http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I am a big fan of biobeastie 3.0, that is much
>> along the lines of what I was thinking, but was
>> not able to concept. I suck at concept drawing,
>> etc...=(
>>
>> Biobeastie 2.0 reminds me a lot of the polar bears
>> with their armor in The golden compass. I think it
>> is a neat idea, but I think it would be easily
>> distinguishable and seen as too similar to those
>> characters.
>>
>> What do you guys think? I am just shooting from
>> left field here...=)
>>
>> --- On *Thu, 7/9/09, eric drewes
>> /<figarus@xxxxxxxxx
>> <
>> http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=figarus@xxxxxxxxx>>/*
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx
>> <
>> http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=figarus@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR
>> WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK BEAST
>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <
>> http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 2:03 PM
>>
>>
>>
>> I've attached the two more concepts I've come
>> up with- biobeastie 2.0 was done after people
>> suggested a more biological and less
>> mechanical look to the beastie, and 3.0 was
>> done with the steampunk idea in mind. Please
>> forgive my ghetto color coding, all I had to
>> color with was a couple of highlighters
>> (hooray for slacking at work!). The green
>> bits are fluids/tubes/wires, the yellow is for
>> brains/veins/biological bits, and the shaded
>> silver parts are all metal.
>> These are rough concepts. Once we agree on a
>> general shape/build for the beast, I can work
>> up detailed images with different views and
>> proper colors.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:25 PM, katie cook
>> <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx
>> <http://mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I might be modeling it, it depends on
>> if I get the go ahead from Eric and if
>> no one else was slotted to model it. I
>> have only been doing props up to this
>> point, and there are some other peeps
>> that have been handling characters,
>> etc. I want to make sure they are cool
>> with it first.
>> I just had
>> some really basic ideas.
>> You should post what you got. It could
>> be very similar to what you had in
>> mind. =) Maybe I could add on to what
>> you have already worked out...?
>>
>>
>> --- On *Wed, 7/8/09, Elizabeth
>> Patrician /<potatoart@xxxxxxxxx
>> <http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx
>> >>/*
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Elizabeth Patrician
>> <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx
>> <
>> http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>
>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE
>> POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE
>> STEAMPUNK BEAST
>> To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <
>> http://mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2009,
>> 4:34 PM
>>
>>
>> I'd love to see your concepts as
>> well, Katie, especially since
>> you're going to be the one
>> modeling it. What did you have in
>> mind?
>>
>>
>> On
>> Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:58 PM,
>> <figarus@xxxxxxxxx
>> <
>> http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=figarus@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> If you two want to work
>> together that would be
>> awesome, I'd like to see what
>> sketches concept wise you come
>> up wqoith
>> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From*: katie cook
>> *Date*: Wed, 8 Jul 2009
>> 13:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
>> *To*:
>> <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <
>> http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Subject*: [project1dev] Re:
>> PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON
>> THE STEAMPUNK BEAST
>> Yeah, that would be cool.
>>
>> I would be interested in
>> modeling it, but that would
>> all be up to Eric and what he
>> wants done...=)
>>
>> --- On *Wed, 7/8/09, Elizabeth
>> Patrician
>> /<potatoart@xxxxxxxxx
>> <
>> http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>>/*
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Elizabeth Patrician
>> <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx
>> <
>> http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>
>> Subject: [project1dev] Re:
>> PLEASE POST IF YOUR
>> WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK BEAST
>> To:
>> project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <
>> http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Date: Wednesday, July 8,
>> 2009, 1:50 PM
>>
>> I'm working on concepts
>> still. I was MIA for a
>> week because I was down in
>> LA, but I can finish the
>> ideas I've got if you guys
>> are ready to start
>> modeling it.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at
>> 1:26 PM, katie cook
>> <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx
>> <
>> http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Just putting this in
>> if someone misses it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
