I haven't seen any of the concept work for the beast, and I was under the impression Katie was going to be working on it. I'd be interested, though, if you'd like me to. Just let me know where the concept work is, and I'll check it out. I'll probably add some questions there, too. Me and my questions.... :P
Elizabeth Patrician wrote:
Whats her noodle being me, of course...I was under the impression that the beast was approved and that Gabriel was going to model the beast based on the concepts that I had already done? I'm very sorry if it's become a point of contention because of my misunderstanding, should I still be reworking it?LizOn Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:34 AM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:After this event, there were posts about modifications and color concepts etc that whats her noodle wanted to change... --- On *Sun, 11/15/09, eric drewes /<figarus@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:figarus@xxxxxxxxx>>/* wrote: From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:figarus@xxxxxxxxx>> Subject: [project1dev] Fwd: Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK BEAST To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sunday, November 15, 2009, 10:01 AM "And I hear its been approved that I can work on the biobeastie thing, but where the heck are the concepts. Has anyone finished that? Is it already finished? What needs to be done? If it is ready to be modeled, post the final concept and Mark it FINAL CONCEPT or something to indicate as such, and I will get on it! And if you still want help with character designs, let me know. Just a description or something to go from and we can shoot back and forth until we reach a point that your happy with." *HERE YOU GO:* ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *katie cook* <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx <http://mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>> Date: Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:43 PM Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK BEAST To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <http://mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I think 3.0 works with the sketch you did, I can work from that.Granted it would be subject to my artistic interpretation ofportrayal... What I mean really is: You could give a few different people the same exact concept and they would all built/model it slightly different. With the models I have been doing personally I have been coming up with colors/look, so I am cool with doing that unless colors/design is something that they guys want done with the concept...?If everyone agrees it is cool to go ahead with it, then I canstart modeling after I finish the wagon if EROCK is cool with that. I haven't checked in with Eric as far as what is up next after we finish the fortune teller area. That might affect it. Need to make sure to stick with his production schedule..=)Anyway, let me know guys what you think and how we are lookingschedule wise...I have an extra day this weekend to work on the project so Iam hoping I can get some things wrapped up!--- On *Thu, 7/9/09, Elizabeth Patrician /<potatoart@xxxxxxxxx <http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>>/* wrote: From: Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx <http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK BEAST To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <http://mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 11:19 PM Okay, I'll work up some more designs along the lines of 3.0, different angles and whatnot. I hadn't realized that 2.0 looked like the Armored Bears...I was just going for something bulkier and more muscular than 1.0. I guess I need to be more careful about those subconscious influences! On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Kent Petersen <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: I agree with you Katie. I think keeping away form mainstream stuff is a good idea. I like the way 3.0 looks more anyway On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: I am a big fan of biobeastie 3.0, that is much along the lines of what I was thinking, but was not able to concept. I suck at concept drawing, etc...=( Biobeastie 2.0 reminds me a lot of the polar bears with their armor in The golden compass. I think it is a neat idea, but I think it would be easily distinguishable and seen as too similar to those characters. What do you guys think? I am just shooting from left field here...=) --- On *Thu, 7/9/09, eric drewes /<figarus@xxxxxxxxx <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=figarus@xxxxxxxxx>>/* wrote: From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=figarus@xxxxxxxxx>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK BEAST To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 2:03 PM I've attached the two more concepts I've come up with- biobeastie 2.0 was done after people suggested a more biological and less mechanical look to the beastie, and 3.0 was done with the steampunk idea in mind. Please forgive my ghetto color coding, all I had to color with was a couple of highlighters (hooray for slacking at work!). The green bits are fluids/tubes/wires, the yellow is for brains/veins/biological bits, and the shadedsilver parts are all metal.These are rough concepts. Once we agree on a general shape/build for the beast, I can work up detailed images with different views and proper colors. On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:25 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx <http://mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: I might be modeling it, it depends on if I get the go ahead from Eric and if no one else was slotted to model it. I have only been doing props up to this point, and there are some other peeps that have been handling characters, etc. I want to make sure they are cool with it first.I just had some really basic ideas.You should post what you got. It could be very similar to what you had in mind. =) Maybe I could add on to what you have already worked out...? --- On *Wed, 7/8/09, Elizabeth Patrician /<potatoart@xxxxxxxxx <http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>>/* wrote: From: Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx <http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK BEAST To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <http://mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 4:34 PM I'd love to see your concepts as well, Katie, especially since you're going to be the one modeling it. What did you have in mind?On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:58 PM,<figarus@xxxxxxxxx <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=figarus@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: If you two want to work together that would be awesome, I'd like to see what sketches concept wise you come up wqoith Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From*: katie cook *Date*: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:54:49 -0700 (PDT) *To*: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> *Subject*: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK BEAST Yeah, that would be cool.I would be interested inmodeling it, but that would all be up to Eric and what he wants done...=) --- On *Wed, 7/8/09, Elizabeth Patrician /<potatoart@xxxxxxxxx <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>>/* wrote: From: Elizabeth Patrician <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK BEAST To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 1:50 PM I'm working on concepts still. I was MIA for a week because I was down in LA, but I can finish the ideas I've got if you guys are ready to start modeling it.On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at1:26 PM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx <http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Just putting this in if someone misses it.
