Whats her noodle being me, of course... I was under the impression that the beast was approved and that Gabriel was going to model the beast based on the concepts that I had already done? I'm very sorry if it's become a point of contention because of my misunderstanding, should I still be reworking it? Liz On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:34 AM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > After this event, there were posts about modifications and color > concepts etc that whats her noodle wanted to change... > > > --- On *Sun, 11/15/09, eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx>* wrote: > > > From: eric drewes <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [project1dev] Fwd: Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE > STEAMPUNK BEAST > To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Sunday, November 15, 2009, 10:01 AM > > > "And I hear its been approved that I can work on the biobeastie thing, > but where the heck are the concepts. Has anyone finished that? Is it already > finished? What needs to be done? If it is ready to be modeled, post the > final concept and Mark it FINAL CONCEPT or something to indicate as such, > and I will get on it! And if you still want help with character designs, let > me know. Just a description or something to go from and we can shoot back > and forth until we reach a point that your happy with." > > > *HERE YOU GO:* > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:43 PM > Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK > BEAST > To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > I think 3.0 works with the sketch you did, I can work from that. > > Granted it would be subject to my artistic interpretation of portrayal... > What I mean really is: > You could give a few different people the same exact concept and they would > all built/model it slightly different. With the models I have been doing > personally I have been coming up with colors/look, so I am cool with doing > that unless colors/design is something that they guys want done with the > concept...? > > If everyone agrees it is cool to go ahead with it, then I can start > modeling after I finish the wagon if EROCK is cool with that. I haven't > checked in with Eric as far as what is up next after we finish the fortune > teller area. That might affect it. Need to make sure to stick with his > production schedule..=) > > Anyway, let me know guys what you think and how we are looking schedule > wise... > > I have an extra day this weekend to work on the project so I am hoping I > can get some things wrapped up! > > > > --- On *Thu, 7/9/09, Elizabeth Patrician > <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx> > >* wrote: > > > From: Elizabeth Patrician > <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK > BEAST > To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 11:19 PM > > > Okay, I'll work up some more designs along the lines of 3.0, different > angles and whatnot. > I hadn't realized that 2.0 looked like the Armored Bears...I was just going > for something bulkier and more muscular than 1.0. I guess I need to be more > careful about those subconscious influences! > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Kent Petersen > <kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=kentkmp@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > >> I agree with you Katie. I think keeping away form mainstream stuff is a >> good idea. I like the way 3.0 looks more anyway >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM, katie cook >> <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> >> > wrote: >> >>> I am a big fan of biobeastie 3.0, that is much along the lines of what >>> I was thinking, but was not able to concept. I suck at concept drawing, >>> etc...=( >>> >>> Biobeastie 2.0 reminds me a lot of the polar bears with their armor in >>> The golden compass. I think it is a neat idea, but I think it would be >>> easily distinguishable and seen as too similar to those characters. >>> >>> What do you guys think? I am just shooting from left field here...=) >>> >>> --- On *Thu, 7/9/09, eric drewes >>> <figarus@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=figarus@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >* wrote: >>> >>> >>> From: eric drewes >>> <figarus@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=figarus@xxxxxxxxx>> >>> >>> >>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK >>> BEAST >>> To: >>> project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 2:03 PM >>> >>> >>> >>> I've attached the two more concepts I've come up with- biobeastie 2.0 was >>> done after people suggested a more biological and less mechanical look to >>> the beastie, and 3.0 was done with the steampunk idea in mind. Please >>> forgive my ghetto color coding, all I had to color with was a couple of >>> highlighters (hooray for slacking at work!). The green bits are >>> fluids/tubes/wires, the yellow is for brains/veins/biological bits, and the >>> shaded silver parts are all metal. >>> >>> These are rough concepts. Once we agree on a general shape/build for the >>> beast, I can work up detailed images with different views and proper colors. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:25 PM, katie cook >>>> <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> I might be modeling it, it depends on if I get the go ahead from >>>>> Eric and if no one else was slotted to model it. I have only been doing >>>>> props up to this point, and there are some other peeps that have been >>>>> handling characters, etc. I want to make sure they are cool with it first. >>>>> >>>>> I just had some really basic ideas. You should post what you got. It >>>>> could be very similar to what you had in mind. =) Maybe I could add on to >>>>> what you have already worked out...? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --- On *Wed, 7/8/09, Elizabeth Patrician >>>>> <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >* wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: Elizabeth Patrician >>>>> <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> > >>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE STEAMPUNK >>>>> BEAST >>>>> To: >>>>> project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 4:34 PM >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'd love to see your concepts as well, Katie, especially since you're >>>>> going to be the one modeling it. What did you have in mind? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:58 PM, >>>>> <figarus@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=figarus@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> If you two want to work together that would be awesome, I'd like to >>>>>> see what sketches concept wise you come up wqoith >>>>>> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> *From*: katie cook >>>>>> *Date*: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:54:49 -0700 (PDT) >>>>>> *To*: >>>>>> <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Subject*: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE >>>>>> STEAMPUNK BEAST >>>>>> Yeah, that would be cool. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would be interested in modeling it, but that would all be up to Eric >>>>>> and what he wants done...=) >>>>>> >>>>>> --- On *Wed, 7/8/09, Elizabeth Patrician >>>>>> <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> >* wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Elizabeth Patrician >>>>>> <potatoart@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=potatoart@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> > >>>>>> Subject: [project1dev] Re: PLEASE POST IF YOUR WORKING ON THE >>>>>> STEAMPUNK BEAST >>>>>> To: >>>>>> project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 1:50 PM >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm working on concepts still. I was MIA for a week because I was >>>>>> down in LA, but I can finish the ideas I've got if you guys are ready to >>>>>> start modeling it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM, katie cook >>>>>> <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc361.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Just putting this in if someone misses it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > >