Checking in. Been busy as hell lately, between looking for work, school, and now moving, I have not had much time for the project. I think the biggest thing on my plate was designing the hacking mini game and helping Nick with temple construction (the script part) On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > makes sense (sorry for muddying thread with the side discussions) :P > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:47 PM, David Weivoda <david.weivoda@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> Yeah that sounds good. If you edit it and put your name I would >> suggest time/date stamping it. >> >> On Thursday, October 15, 2009, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Color coding is a good idea, i'll see if our wiki can do that! >> > >> > i pictured the comments to include all dialog about the task including >> something like this "Alan: I'm working on this issue" to show who is workin >> on it >> > >> > maybe we can do something like... >> > >> > yellow highlighted title = in progress >> > red highlighted title = blocked by another task (ie waiting for art or >> design etc) >> > >> > hows that sound? >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:18 PM, David Weivoda <david.weivoda@xxxxxxxxx >> > <javascript:_e({}, >> 'cvml', 'david.weivoda@xxxxxxxxx');>> wrote: >> > >> > I like the look of that page! I think what you need are some clear >> identifiers for each of the tasks, where they are at and who they are >> assigned too. An example would be formatted like below. >> > >> > >> > Art Under way >> > >> > >> > >> > art and animation for the old man (we have temp art to use)Task awaiting >> upload Assigned to "blank" to place, "date": Eric: alex has temp art for the >> strange man, real guy will be done using character creator. Alan: So this >> task is just to put the strange man's temp art in it sounds like. >> > >> > >> > >> > I think the things that each task would need to have are; >> > 1) has it been assigned, if yes to whom >> > 2) has it been started >> > 3) status of its completion (i.e. just started, awaiting additional >> info, ready for upload) >> > 4) date expected for completion >> > 5) once complete marked as complete by whom, when. >> > >> > Then we can follow that up with the details about the task. In other >> words we need information about the task not just what the task is. I would >> definitely suggest some kind of legend or key at the top of the wiki stating >> how people should either comment with their name & where or dated so people >> can tell who said what and when. >> > >> > >> > >> > As for how work is distributed, I think a combination of first come >> first serve and pick anything marked as open or alan/eric/sid can assign a >> task to someone looking for work (or just assign it if it needs done). At >> the time a new task or item is created the person responsible can either >> choose someone to assign it to or just throw it up there and let people find >> it. One nice thing about having sort of key or legend and lots of detail is >> it lets us just do a quick find on the page for "open task" or something and >> boom, scroll down till you find something. >> > >> > >> > >> > just my thoughts. >> > >> > David >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > i made up this page to try and handle the problem of people not knowin >> what to work on next: >> > >> > http://pyotek.com/projects/wiki/doku.php?id=currentmilestone >> > >> > but it might not be the best system in place (we are figuring out our >> org stuff a lil better right now i know...) >> > >> > what do you guys think, how should someone get new tasks >> > >> > Should we keep a prioritized list somewhere (like on the wiki) of whats >> needed and people can grab what they want? >> > >> > Or should we dish it out (ie eric gives out art stuff, i give out tech >> stuff, or sid gives out all tasks or something else?) >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:48 PM, eric <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Biobeast? :P I dunno - ask nick to send his temple props list for now >> and see if anything grabs you >> > >> > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile >> > >> > >> > From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:33:23 -0700 (PDT) >> > To: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > >> > >> > Subject: [project1dev] Re: Cracking the whip! >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > You guys could give me something to do...ERIC...Ummmmmm....Yeah. =) >> > >> > I posted last week that I am wide open. Whenever your ready for me t >> > >> >> >