[project1dev] Re: Combat system and camera angles

  • From: Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:32:56 -0700

Something else we could do to make sure the player wasnt obscured behind

right now the walls are double sided (ie boxes)

if we made them 1 sided, back face culling could work to our advantage so
that you could see through walls that were facing away from the camera but
still see walls facing towards the camera.  basically no wall would obscure
the player, but things like houses and other objects still would

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:25 AM, <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Tentatively, overhead like ff, chrono trigger...with some special case
> scenarios of course... And changing angles for dramatic effect for cut
> scenes- But if we can make it work with another view or a floating camera...
> I'm basically up for anything as long as its easy to use for the player
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
> ------------------------------
> *From*: Kent Petersen
> *Date*: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:18:42 -0700
> *To*: <project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: [project1dev] Re: Combat system and camera angles
>  Out of curiosity, what is the camera view going to be in the end?
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> actually nevermind on the camera thing, i don't know how that would work
>> w/ mouse and keyboard and we want to make it work for both that and
>> controller.
>> save it for later i geuss if we want...
>> that just leaves the transparency thing.  We can wait til if we need it
>> before that goes in, no sense making something that might not even be
>> needed.
>> so lol, nevermind...
>> but yeah, re: the combat thing, sounds good
>>   On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>> er and by "look the direction you are running" i mean keep the not quite
>>> overhead camera view, but basically it would rotate that so that the way you
>>> were running was always straight up.  Hard to explain but shrug, probly
>>> would be easy enough to code and see if it's good or not.
>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>> for the combat, sure.  yeah like you say its just 1 extra command,
>>>> shouldn't be bad.
>>>> for the camera that makes sense.  What may be easiest in that light then
>>>> is making objects fade into semi transparency if they obscure the player,
>>>> but i think having the camera look the direction you are running in the
>>>> overworld still might work out, we'll have to try it (:
>>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:35 AM, <figarus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Hey alan I was thinking for the temp combat system, if there were three
>>>>> menu items - defend, attack, super attack, all of which coincide with an
>>>>> appropriate "stance" during rt - like if you super attacl you're 
>>>>> vulnerable,
>>>>> attack you take 1/2 total damage, defend you take zero damage, and the 
>>>>> enemy
>>>>> cycles through this as well... Itd only be one extra command but would
>>>>> actually allow some test strategy, etc - not sure if it is worth it or how
>>>>> much harder that would be...
>>>>> Camera system - here is my apprehension... I read game reviews  and a
>>>>> lot of ppl bitch about the camera if it is inconsistant or fucks with the
>>>>> controls, etc.  I think it should be our main priority to make controls
>>>>> fluid and intuitive.  If we can have a non fixed camera that allows 
>>>>> that...
>>>>> Great. I'd love to pllay with angles, etc for dramatic effect... Will
>>>>> probably require testing to see.... I just don't want camera issues to 
>>>>> drag
>>>>> down the game but you're more experienced than me on dealing with that so 
>>>>> I
>>>>> trust your instincts :)
>>>>> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

Other related posts: