[project1dev] Re: Biobeastie room question

  • From: katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:17:38 -0800 (PST)

So why would it need to be the same size in units??? Can you explain how that 
If you modify the object, it would be near impossible to keep it the same size 
units because your altering the geometry.
I would think that if all the rotations, and scalings are zeroed out, and the 
orientation is at 0,0,0, then the size of the actual object wouldn't matter. 
Maybe we should do a test to make sure that we are talking about the same 

--- On Tue, 3/2/10, Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Alan Wolfe <alan.wolfe@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [project1dev] Re: Biobeastie room question
To: project1dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, March 2, 2010, 10:23 AM

i dont know what freezing your transformations means but if its the same size 
in units afterwords as it was before it should be fine.

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:19 AM, katie cook <ktmcook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hey Guys (Alan),
I had a question about scale in the level editor.
So when I export my files into milkshape, I always freeze my transformations so 
everything reads 0,0,0 (rotation) 1,1,1 (scale) 0,0,0 (transform, where it is 
in space).
If I was to make an object and export it with this info, then go back and 
modify the object/scale it if need be, then freeze it so it reads the same info 
again, would that translate to the level editor the same? Or does it throw 
everything off in the file?
I ask because the other day you said if I was to do placeholder models, then 
modify them and update the files, the scale and position would have to be the 
same. I always group my objects together as 1 hierarchy, so I don't imagine the 
orientation will be a problem, but I am hoping that it is the same for scale.
Let me know, I hope this makes sense.



Other related posts: