RE: createing a transparent interface for serialization?
- From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 00:33:14 -0400
That would be for straight up serialization , not ORM, just to be clear.
Take care,
Sina
-----Original Message-----
From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 11:33 PM
To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: createing a transparent interface for serialization?
C++ boost.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 7, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Tyler Littlefield <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
> - From what I can tell: hybe seems to be a library for Java; is there
> something similar for c++?
>
> On 10/6/2010 9:31 AM, Sina Bahram wrote:
>> Have you examined ORM solutions? Hibernate is very popular, for example.
>>
>> Take care,
>> Sina
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tyler
>> Littlefield
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 11:20 AM
>> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: createing a transparent interface for serialization?
>>
>> Hello all,
>> I want to set up serialization of objects in my mud engine a bit differently
>> than it currently is.
>> Right now, Ijust write all the values to a file in binary form, then
>> read them back in in the same order, but Iwant the user to be able to choose
>> xml, binary, or any other sort of backend they want
for serialization.
>> So, Ihave a question. how should this be done? the idea would be for
>> each object to call a function, without having to know what it is storing.
>> I've thought my player file will look like this:
>> <player>
>> <name>ty</name>
>> <password>asdfghjklasdfghjkl</password>
>> </player>
>> so Isuppose Ican just do a key-value sort of setup where Isend the
>> name and the value, and binary can ignore the name while XML does not?
>> That being said though, I still need to set it up a bit differently
>> from that, so any help is appriciated with suggestions and ideas.
>>
> __________
> View the list's information and change your settings at
> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
> __________
> View the list's information and change your settings at
> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
>
>
>
> - --
> Thanks,
> Tyler Littlefield
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMrop4AAoJELDPyrppriJP2gQH/RNsNVfMTER4zDgIBtl/wNxE
> LTh5SMxp7V2BvW+UBdJZKOpfpj9ImV+FgQWcbMso8V3k9S3qXziuc9kiBU6+vU86
> 94BO1jojl534EHHBSy1vblqHXSRaC5zpKRyiKZaPnEAwG7a2kHxwfgE+mPnbrXAR
> q8Twxw4W3ZJx35DMzxPZ4A0rLFwO4hrnQaeRC+INlpqrgvkXu/vo5T9uvLnLdKW7
> OA4v9yCVhmJp/rH+NRwXWjBZGSb5eAJiM8yXVhYLWviQBc1KogDP5UyP2xlgjGaw
> QScJNjFVJ3XKK5/Y0Kk+OKVH77I8EzlsoAv2TuZqZKK7MIjLcCdWMFAK6ngBacg=
> =9fMq
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> __________
> View the list's information and change your settings at
> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
Other related posts:
