RE: appsetup.exe

  • From: "Stanzel, Susan - Kansas City, MO" <susan.stanzel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:35:28 -0600

I have a U.S.D.A. employee. I just installed Jim's scripts for Eclipse. I have 
admin rights to update JAWS. Am I doing something wrong? Each time JAWS has an 
update it must be tested in Beltsville, Maryland before we are given permission 
to use it. Losing my job is not very high on things that I want to do (grin).

Susie Stanzel

-----Original Message-----
From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Trouble
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 9:02 AM
To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: appsetup.exe

I wouldn't hold my breath on FS doing that.
it took the government telling FS that they would drop sells if 
remote was not in the software. Took them 6 months get that feature 
right for use and that was after a new release. So that year was 2 
version releases.
When it comes down to a few people they move slow and when threatened 
with lose of total income they do it now.
Just like the winamp scripts. Took them 3 versions before they put 
them in script package for jaws.

At 09:00 AM 3/4/2011, you wrote:
>Thanks, my employer bought jaws for windows which needs to be labeled
>more accurately as jaws for windows word processor's edition.  The
>appsetup.exe and jsx jaws script exchange when added then turn jaws for
>windows into jaws for windows programmer's edition.  This is critical
>because as of two days ago I was presented with a Hobson's choice.  To
>understand it, you need to understand that even for
>programmers/developers with dev accounts that group of people is only
>allowed to have NMCI approved software on their systems.  For software
>to get approved, it has to go through a blackbox testing procedure which
>costs lots of dollars and will only be done if many people will be using
>the software packages in question.  These two jaws add-ons will be used
>by too few people to make the blackbox testing worthwhile so it won't
>get done and the software packages in this context will never get
>approved.  When unapproved software is found on a user's computer, they
>loose that computer system and they also loose their job.  That nearly
>happened to a lady who is working with us on the project I've been
>assigned and a Tier three technician installed the software on her
>machine.  What will be done if D.O.D. requests it is freedomscientific
>will install the latest version of jaws script exchange and appsetup.exe
>in its next version of jaws for windows for D.O.D. and that next version
>of jaws for windows will go through testing and once approved be put on
>all machines needing speech screen reader services.  All of this takes
>time which means I won't be doing any development on the current project
>but may do development on future projects given packages become
>available and work as advertised.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Homme, James
>Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 8:10
>To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: appsetup.exe
>
>Hi,
>If you get the JAWS Scripts Exchange, you will get some free scripting
>utilities in the zip folder of that package after you install. Check the
>JAWS Scripting category on http://www.nonvisualdevelopment.org.
>
>Jim.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of DaShiell,
>Jude T. CIV NAVAIR 1490, 1, 26
>Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 7:40 AM
>To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: re: appsetup.exe
>
>Is appsetup.exe the only free jaws for windows development add-on in use
>these days or do other add-on packages exist which a modern and real
>development environment ought to have installed?
>__________
>View the list's information and change your settings at
>//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
>
>This e-mail and any attachments to it are confidential and are intended
>solely for use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
>If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and then delete it.  If you are not the intended recipient,
>you must not keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this e-mail without
>the author's prior permission.  The views expressed in this e-mail
>message do not necessarily represent the views of Highmark Inc., its
>subsidiaries, or affiliates.
>__________
>View the list's information and change your settings at
>//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
>__________
>View the list's information and change your settings at
>//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

Tim
trouble

"Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance."
--Sam Brown

Blindeudora list owner.
To subscribe or info: //www.freelists.org/webpage/blindeudora       

__________
View the list's information and change your settings at 
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

Other related posts: