What I mean is that the developers of the software could probably use a crash course in accessibility for the blind by blind individuals. That's what I meant. And I feel that as the leader of a blindness advocacy organization, I feel that I should get as many people as possible to give that run-through, but I tried to talk to them via the forums, and nothing came out of it. Not with just me at least. -----Original Message----- From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alex Midence Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 4:16 AM To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: SharpDevelop 4.0 not accessible, what can be done about it? Who is this "folken" you keep mentioning? am I missing something? It's late at night ... Is this a group of som sort? alex M On 12/14/10, Katherine Moss <plymouthroamer285@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think it does, but I don't think Eclipse is fully featured for that > language, is it? And isn't it true that not only does visual studio > come at the full featured version with all of the languages supported, > but isn't it true that you can buy the versions with single language > support but still in the professional range? And have any of you > taken a look at the code for SharpDevelop to see if any quick > modifications can be made to it to make it a bit more accessible? I > was always under the impression that all software can be accessible > with the right folken joining in, right? Or could the problem be one of it's larger components, such as the editor for example? > That can really cause issues if the code of that is not available, right? > Fill me in. Thanks. > > -----Original Message----- > From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alex > Midence > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 2:56 PM > To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: SharpDevelop 4.0 not accessible, what can be done about it? > > They have to want to do it. Only way they'd be convinced is if > someone ported some code or gave them pointers on how to do it. If it > turns out that the've busted it up enough that they'd have to do a ton > of work to get it accessible, it's a losing battle. They don't get paid, after all. > Doesn't Eclipse have a c# plugin? > > Alex M > > On 12/14/10, Katherine Moss <plymouthroamer285@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Yes, but are you saying that there's nothing we can do about this? >> Won't a few of us on here at least try to have a conversation with >> the Sharpdevelop folken? I ask this because if that program can do a >> lot of what VS2010 can do, and you run into somebody who can't afford >> VS2010, then it'd be a fine choice for them, and blind individuals >> wouldn't be limited. I don't like limitations, and I like to see >> especially open source individuals put more emphasis on accessibility. >> >> >> >> From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of black >> ares >> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:29 AM >> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: SharpDevelop 4.0 not accessible, what can be done about it? >> >> >> >> I am using visual studio express editio n2008 which is available >> still on microsoft's website >> >> and I have done a lot of things with it. >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: Katherine Moss <mailto:plymouthroamer285@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 7:05 AM >> >> Subject: RE: SharpDevelop 4.0 not accessible, what can be done about it? >> >> >> >> Yes it was. In some of it's ancient versions. But with downgrading >> comes feature degradation, so considering it's an open source >> project, I'm hoping that I can rally a bunch of you guys to talk to >> the developers and then to maybe join it? I would if my programming >> skills were stronger, but unfortunately, I'd only botch everything if >> I did that. As the leader of a blindness advocacy group (see my last >> post for our web site), I'm asking a favor. 30 or 40 people is >> better than one. The editor that the project uses is called Avalon >> editor, and that's where the issue is, as well as in the dialog >> boxes. I like visual studio 2010, but what about for computers that >> can't handle it, > like my aging and out of date desktop for instance? >> And what about for those folken who can't afford it? >> >> >> >> Katherine >> >> >> >> From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of black >> ares >> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 11:55 PM >> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: SharpDevelop 4.0 not accessible, what can be done about it? >> >> >> >> was sharp develop ever accessible? >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: Katherine Moss <mailto:plymouthroamer285@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 9:23 PM >> >> Subject: SharpDevelop 4.0 not accessible, what can be done about it? >> >> >> >> Hi there folks, >> >> I've talked to the developers of SharpDevelop regarding accessibility >> with screen readers in the latest version, and they say that they >> have too much on their plate to worry about it. I was pretty strong >> in my reply back saying that if they weren't going to do it, then >> I'll get somebody who would. Has anyone else here downloaded that >> and looked at the apalling things they've done to it? Just curious. Thanks. >> >> >> >> Katherine >> >> > __________ > View the list's information and change your settings at > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > > __________ > View the list's information and change your settings at > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind