Re: Seeking perspectives on a computer purchasing predicament

  • From: Nimer <nimerjaber1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:56:06 -0600

Yes, NVDA does work with 64-bit vista, I've tried it out on a friend's machine. As for orca, linux, and windows, I don't know how that would work, but I would imagine that it would work.

Thanks
Nimer J

Nimer M. Jaber

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it
is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in 
reliance
upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient 
is
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete 
the
material from any computer.

Website:
http://www.empowertheblind.org
Phone:
(720) (251-4530)



Jamal Mazrui wrote:
I know there is a 64 bit version of Python, but are you sure that NVDA
fully runs on 64 bits.  Aren't any of the APIs it uses dependent on 32
bits?  How about the software synthesizers?  I am not saying that it
does not work as well on 64 bits, but am seeking further clarification.

Similarly, I'm curious how well Orca and VoiceOver work on 64 bits if
anyone knows.  Would it be possible, for example, to make the machine dual
boot with 64 bit Linux and Orca on another partition from the 32 bit
Vista?

Jamal
On
Thu, 2 Oct 2008, Nimer wrote:

Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 08:30:11 -0600
From: Nimer <nimerjaber1@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Seeking perspectives on a computer purchasing predicament

NVDA does actually work with 64-bit OS, but it is limited in what it can
do on any OS, so I would not recommend it to just the ordinary user.
Thanks
Nimer J

Nimer M. Jaber

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it
is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in 
reliance
upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient 
is
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete 
the
material from any computer.

Website:
http://www.empowertheblind.org
Phone:
(720) (251-4530)



Chris Hofstader wrote:
Hey J,

I've been running JAWS 9.xx.xxx on a 64 bit Core Two HP with 32 bit Vista
loaded for about a year and a half.  I haven't installed JAWS 10.xx on
anything yet so cannot comment on it.

My Vista box and JAWS get along relatively well and I find that, excepting
many applications which JAWS 9 does not support adequately, the system works
acceptably.  I also find that having System Access around (I guess everyone
has the "to go" version at their fingertips) is helpful as Monster Matt has
made some very useful Vista things work really well with SA that are highly
problematic with JAWS.

On some specifics: JAWS 9 does great with IE, VisualStudio (using the
scripts developed on this list) and a reasonably adequate job with Office
2007 and other programs I find useful.  It is useless in the Vista voice
recognition system (SA kicks ass) and most of the multi-media stuff that you
might enjoy using to turn your new PC into a DVR or for downloading and
playing movies from bit torrent and other sites.

Office 2007 works reasonably well with both JAWS and SA on Vista and is not
a 64 bit program but, like all Intel processors from 386 on forward, it can
"step down" and run programs designed for earlier generation chips.  I doubt
Vista supports any 16 bit Windows programs but most Win32 applications
should still work.

  The 32 bit Vista builds can only address 3.5 gb of memory with SP1,
previously, it could only address 2 gb so this is an improvement.  Of
course, the four gb in my HP has been partially unused since I got the
thing.

I haven't done much more than fiddle around with Window-Eyes 6.xx on Vista
and it worked pretty good.  I wrote a bunch of blog entries last summer
comparing and contrasting JAWS, WE and SA as they were then with Vista which
might be of some value to you if you go to BC and search the blog on related
terms.

If SA and WE are at all like JAWS internally, it will probably be quite some
time until any of them start supporting the 64 bit architecture.  There are
likely assumptions all over the place about the size of different elements
being 32 bits and not 64.  Porting from one to another, in a modern, clean
code base will be less hard than an older one that has been hacked and
repaired many times over the years as is the case with JAWS and, I'll assume
parts of WE as well.  SA has a very new code base and a whole lot less code
to port so Monster Matt may be able to do it in relatively short order.  I'd
also guess that the NVDA guys (I haven't looked at their source with this
problem in mind), because they are based almost entirely on documented API
and not too much if at all on hooking hacks, may be able to take the jump
more easily than the others.

I find it discouraging in general that no current Windows screen reader
supports the off-the-shelf PCs available at the consumer electronics stores
anymore.  When I worked at FS, we would often talk about trying to make sure
JAWS would "work with the PC that will show up under the Christmas tree..."
in any given year.  More often than not, we made it (we were late with a
default copy protection scheme that didn't require a floppy drive) but this
year, it appears as if the only 64 bit screen readers will be Orca and
VoiceOver and nothing (as far as I can tell) for Windows.

Regarding price and performance for a standard use PC with screen reader, I
think we're starting to hit a wall of diminishing returns.  Lots of the
extra horsepower and memory is great for multi-media stuff and really
serious number and database crunching.  Frankly, I don't do any of that kind
of thing and the most compute intensive things I use (probably the HRTF
functions in Direct X) do not, at least in my applications, bog down a
relatively old 32 bit single core XP laptop and don't even come close to a
bottleneck on my year and a half old Vista machine.  I must say that the 64
bit OSX Leopard edition on Macintosh is really peppy but comparing that to
Windows is not a fair way to judge as the software running is also vastly
different.

I find that for price/performance for a solid PC that will do everything I
want it to the best prices are available at www.dell.com/outlet where you
can get a lease return with full guarantee that will contain a really
kicking processor, decent sized hd, as much memory as you will need or want
for about $350 and a very adequate PC for around $150.  If you want to take
the plunge into Macintosh, for a little over $1000 you can get a kick ass
laptop and run XP under VMWare with the screen reader of your choice in a
separate Window.  Other than web browsing related tasks where JAWS, WE, SA,
etc. are all better) , I find that I can get almost everything I need to do
done well on a Macintosh with VoiceOver quickly and with a level of
stability I couldn't dream of on a PC with a screen reader (at one point, I
kept my Macintosh running non-stop for four weeks without a single need to
reboot until I installed some new software).

Ok, you asked for perspectives and I'm in a NyQuil haze after walking some
distance through Cambridge in a downpour yesterday so this is what you
get...

Happy Hacking,
cdh












Chris Hofstader
CUNY, BSO, ATG, Odds and Ends
email: cdh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Blog: http://www.blindconfidential.blogspot.com
Skype: BlindChristian
phone: 727-896-6393


-----Original Message-----
From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jamal Mazrui
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 9:01 AM
To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Seeking perspectives on a computer purchasing predicament

About 10 days ago, I purchased a new computer from a Best Buy store in
Silver Spring, Maryland.  My hope was to get good value on the computer
and from the store's "Geek Squad" service that delivers and installs it,
including a wireless network.  I had not bought a new computer in several
years and was not familiar with hardware differences in current offerings.
I knew I wanted the home version of Windows Vista, and asked the senior
technical representative on duty for a recommendation on a computer that
used "industry-standard" components as much as possible, thereby
maximizing compatibility with the screen reader technology that I used.  I
emphasized memory and hard disk space over a graphics card and monitor
intended for games.  The representative indicated that he understood my
needs and recommended a Del computer with relatively large memory and hard
disk specifications.

Last Saturday, a Geek Squad technician delivered the computer to my home,
installed it and the wireless network.  At the end of the process, he
mentioned that it was a 64-bit computer.  I was shocked and dismayed as I
knew that no screen reader worked with 64-bits yet.  As evidence, I had
him run a copy of JAWS, which immediately said it would not work on a
64-bit computer.  The technician acknowledged that it had been a mistake
to recommend such a computer, particularly in the context of my request
for industry-standard components, and without even asking me if 64-bits
was an acceptable specification.  He said he would return on Wednesday
with a replacement, 32-bit computer.

It had not occured to me to specify 32-bits because I had perceived it,
although changing over time, as still being a feature of high-end
computers intended for a circumscribed set of resource-intensive
applications, rather than for customers at a Best Buy store with a typical
consumer interest in running a range of applications, including ones found
on the Internet.

The technician was scheduled to arrive between noon and 4 PM on Wednesday,
yesterday.  I took a vacation day from work to be there, though I had not
wanted to lose vacation time for this originally.  Despite repeated calls
I made during the day to confirm the appointment, the technician did not
call me until about 4:30 from the Best Buy store, where he said he
discovered no 32-bit computers available.  He discussed the problem with
others there and said their recommendation was to load a 32-bit version of
Vista on the 64-bit computer I purchased.  Although they had little actual
experience with this, and were unable to contact a Del representative to
confirm the approach, they were confident it would work except that only
3.5 out of the 6 gigabytes of memory would be addressable because that was
an upper limit for 32-bit Windows.  I asked but they were not willing to
call other Best Buy stores in the greater DC area to check if they had a
32-bit Del computer in stock.  I said I would go along with this plan, now
scheduled for a Sunday installation at my home, but that I would have to
do immediate testing of various programs to assure myself that there were
no compatibility problems.  Since it is a few days away, I thought it best
to schedule the re-install and do some additional research in the
meantime.

With that background, I am seeking information and advice from list
members on a few questions.  Will there be no compatibility problems from
loading 32-bit Vista and drivers on a 32-bit computer.  Specifically, it
is a Del Inspiron Model I530-110B.

Is 3.5 gigabytes the maximum addressable memory in this case?  Would the
same limit be true on a 32-bit computer?

I had also purchased Microsoft Office Professional 2007.  They said that
the same version runs on either 32-bit or 64-bit computers.  Is that the
case?

Does anyone have more experience to share about Best Buy and Geek Squad?
The representatives involved say that they usually sell 64-bit computers
now.  I find this surprising since I thought a majority of software still
requires 32-bits today.  Is their statement credible?  Is this the default
retail practice now?

Jamal

__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3486 (20081001) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind


__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

__________
View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

__________
View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

Other related posts: