RE: Google accessible search gone

  • From: "Steve Jacobson" <steve.jacobson@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: "programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:02:05 -0500

Sina,

I feel similarly.  If I do a search for something, I want the best match, not 
what someone thinks is the most accessible.  <smile>

Best regards,

Steve Jacobson

On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:58:34 -0400, Sina Bahram wrote:

>I technically define the accessible search as inaccessible, as it simply 
>subscribes to this idea, and to coin someone who might not
>be on the list anymore, of: ghetto blindness products.

>the web is what it is, sorting websites by some artificial metric of 
>accessibility is not how I want to use the web, thanks anyways.

>Take care,
>Sina

>-----Original Message-----
>From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Jacobson
>Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 11:45 AM
>To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: Google accessible search gone

>Seriously, don't you think we're throwing around the term "inaccessible" a 
>little loosely to say that the regular Google search is
>inaccessible?  While it 
>sounds nice, I've never used the so-called accessible search, always using the 
>regular search although I turned off the "instant"
>part.  While there are 
>things I would change if it were written specifically for me, I would not have 
>thought it to be inaccessible.

>Best regards,

>Steve Jacobson


>On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:56:43 +0000, Katherine Moss wrote:

>>Well apparently not, or else we wouldn't be talking about it, would we?

>>From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Littlefield, Tyler
>>Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 10:49 AM
>>To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: Google accessible search gone

>>As is google.
>>On 8/18/2011 8:38 AM, Katherine Moss wrote:

>>I'm just saying that Bing's search is accessible by default, that's all.



>>From: 
>>programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
>Of Jared Wright
>>Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 12:40 AM
>>To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: Re: Google accessible search gone



>>C'mon, Ty, she's a Microsoft fangirl! And one of the most ardent ones I've 
>>ever come in contact with, to be sure. But, hey,  if
>your tools accomplish the 
>tasks and all that...
>>On 8/17/2011 10:36 PM, Littlefield, Tyler wrote:

>>>One thing you should do is switch from google to Bing.  Their searching is 
>>>very good, but if you're trying to use Bing for SEO,
>you might as >well stop 
>right...
>>Microsoft Fanboy incoming.

>>On 8/17/2011 8:23 PM, Katherine Moss wrote:

>>One thing you should do is switch from google to Bing.  Their searching is 
>>very good, but if you're trying to use Bing for SEO, you
>might as well stop right 
>there.  It's an abomination.



>>From: 
>>programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
>Of Dale Leavens
>>Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 12:59 PM
>>To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: Re: Google accessible search gone



>>Typical of this damn computer and Windows Vista. Junk appearing and functions 
>>changing randomly.



>>I am on google many times a day and haven't looked at my cookies in months!



>>Dale leavens.





>>----- Original Message -----

>>From: Bob Kennedy<mailto:intheshop@xxxxxxx>

>>To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>>Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 11:50 AM

>>Subject: Re: Google accessible search gone



>>If you don't turn it off, Google tries to guess what you are searching for.  
>>And you won't necessarily hear what is being added to
>your terms before you hit 
>enter.

>>----- Original Message -----

>>From: Dale Leavens<mailto:dleavens@xxxxxxx>

>>To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>>Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 11:25 AM

>>Subject: Re: Google accessible search gone



>>There seems to be a new link asking users of screen readers to click to turn 
>>off Google Instant what ever that is. I haven't seen
>that before today.



>>Dale leavens.





>>----- Original Message -----

>>From: Jacob Kruger<mailto:jacobk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>>To: ProgrammingBlind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ProgrammingBlind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>>Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 12:18 AM

>>Subject: Google accessible search gone



>>The google accessible search interface, which was here:

>>http://labs.google.com/accessible/



>>is now gone/inactive, and when looking for reasoning, I found the following 
>>blog related to google's labs development/experiments,
>so seems will just have 
>to go back to using the normal google search for now...:

>>http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/07/more-wood-behind-fewer-arrows.html



>>Pity, since the accessible search interface was quite a bit cleaner, and also 
>>ranked search results a bit differently based on the
>'cleanliness' of their 
>content, but anyway.

>>Jacob Kruger
>>Blind Biker
>>Skype: BlindZA
>>'...fate had broken his body, but not his spirit...'



>>--



>>Take care,

>>Ty

>>my website:

>>http://tds-solutions.net

>>my blog:

>>http://tds-solutions.net/blog

>>skype: st8amnd127

>>My programs don't have bugs; they're randomly added features!






>>--



>>Take care,

>>Ty

>>my website:

>>http://tds-solutions.net

>>my blog:

>>http://tds-solutions.net/blog

>>skype: st8amnd127

>>My programs don't have bugs; they're randomly added features!




>__________
>View the list's information and change your settings at 
>//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

>__________
>View the list's information and change your settings at 
>//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind








__________
View the list's information and change your settings at 
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

Other related posts: