Re: Fritz Will Be Digging Into This - Window-Eyes Scripting Introduction
- From: Jeet <LoveForAll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:15:57 -0700
virtualy everyone on this list will be interested to read such info..
I am agree with you,
From where did you get it? Is there any public place from which I can
download it? Can you also send me a copy?
My humble suggestion: mario you just upload the book on any place where all of
us may benifit out of it, or inthane would put on the grabbag site.
Thanks, Jitendra.
Niran
You wrote:
> Sure my friend, let me just brows thru my very big archive of
ebooks and
> i'll send it to you. Don't worry it will be today :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
inthaneelf
> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 2:14 AM
> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Fritz Will Be Digging Into This - Window-Eyes
Scripting
> Introduction
>
> Mario, in your last message, you said "I have the documentation
about SAPI
> synths and how to make them, I can send you the book about it."
>
> would you send me that book/information please, there have been
folks
> looking for information like that out here, smile.
>
> thanks,
> inthane
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mario Percinic" <mario.percinic@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 4:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Fritz Will Be Digging Into This - Window-Eyes
Scripting
> Introduction
>
>
>> Well since you brought up some very good questions,let me break
this
>> message into logical pieces and give you the answers.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Octavian Rasnita" <orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 9:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: Fritz Will Be Digging Into This - Window-Eyes
Scripting
>> Introduction
>>
>>
>>> "Yes, of course I am lazy. So? Is this a problem? :-)"
>>>
>> No ofcourse not, everyone chooses its own way. I was just stating
how
>> the situation in general works with blind popularity, no matter
in
>> what country you are. Ok ofcourse, in smaller countrys like
Romania or
>> Croatia in my case, the situation is harder but than the person
has to
>> see if the solution can be adapted for your language considering
the
>> best results, financial situation, amount of people who work on
the
>> project, timing, knoledge etc.
>>
>>> "I don't think I can build a software synthesizer at least as
good as
>>> US Eloquence by just reading the documentation and making
research,
>>> without knowing C/C++."
>>>
>> Correct, but i never said that. When i said that you can
checkout
>> espeak, i thought that you will find the documentation and the
web
>> page considering the thinks you did in the past. In order to
make
>> better improvements for espeak you really don't need to know c
plus
>> plus, ok if you know it better for you, but still you can see
what
>> sounds wrong and what you can do to make it sound better or to
>> pronounce different characters or words, and also make different
>> voices which really can sound completely different.
>>
>>
>>> "There are more romanian synthesizers, but I don't like any of
them,
>>> and they all are made by software companies that have more good
> programmers.
>>> One of them sounds pretty good but is very slow responsive,
another
>>> one sounds like a robot and it doesn't work at a higher rate,
another
>>> one sounds very very bad (the one which is made by the german
company
>>> Baum, that company that made Gnopernicus screen reader for
Linux, and
>>> Virgo screen reader for Windows)."
>>>
>> If some company has more developers employed that doesn't need to
mean
>> anything. In my case, software solutions which were made by an
>> individual showed up as better because the developer really
showed
>> more interest that his aplication works with all screen readers,
> languages, protocols etc.
>> I worked on almost all software synth development exept Check
>> wintalker voice which is also have adapted for Croatian
language.
>> I told you to try and join espeak development team for Romanian
mainly
>> because espeak is right now used under windows as a sapi 5, as a
stand
>> alone portable version in windows screen reader called nvda, and
orca
>> for linux and also it can work with mac. So lots of platforms
are
>> supported, just because its author is very open minded and
accepts
>> lots of suggestion as long as the person knows language rules
and
>> something about computer usage.
>> If you need more info about speech synths you can contact me
privately
>> and i'll write you more about it.
>>
>>
>>> "Even if I would know C/C++, I don't think that it would be
easy
>>> enough to create a better synthesizer than US Eloquence.
>>> And by the way, where can we find documentation about how to
create a
>>> synthesizer at least as good and fast as Eloquence?
>>> I am asking this, because you seem to be very well informed..."
>>>
>> I have the documentation about sapi synths and how to make them,
i can
>> send you the book about it. Eloquence as far as i'm aware came
out
>> from IBM's via voice which became eloquence at the later time.
>> Eloquence belongs to the group of formant speech synthesizers and
that
>> explains one of the sides why is it so responsive.
>> Mario
>> __________
>> View the list's information and change your settings at
>> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>>
>>
>
>
> __________
> View the list's information and change your settings at
> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
>
> __________
> View the list's information and change your settings at
> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Free pop3 email with a spam filter.
http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/5
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
Other related posts:
