Good ideas, Jim. I wonder if I'm also at risk for being sued for emulating the JAWS keyboard interface with my Homer Layout script! Jamal On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Jim Dunleavy wrote: > Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:16:52 +0100 > From: Jim Dunleavy <jim.dunleavy@xxxxxx> > Reply-To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again > > Hi Jamal, > > I wonder if Sun Microsystems is also at risk of being sued > over Orca's bookmarks feature. > We should try to get as much bad publicity as possible for FS. > Maybe Groklaw would cover the story? > Groklaw has helped on previous occasions to find prior art in > cases where products bases on free software have been attacked, > Barracuda being sued by Trend Micro over ClamAV being a notable example. > It seems the point of software patents is not to protect innovation, > but is about a much dirtier game altogether. > I wasn't at all amazed by this. > > --Jim > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jamal Mazrui <empower@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 12:21 PM > Subject: RE: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again > > > > Hi Ken, > > I suspect you were being tongue in cheeck (and I love your sense of > > humor!). Although legal fights can be entertaining, I don't see how this > > is in the interest of blind people, forcing a company to spend money on > > defending against litigation rather than on R&D to improve access to > > mainstream software. > > > > FYI -- the patent FS claims was violated is described at > > > http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fn > etahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=%226,993,707 > +B2%22&OS= > > > > I'm amazed that FS thought its placemarker feature was innovative enough > > to patent. This seems like an example of taking advantage of the magical > > nature of assistive technology to the uninformed, and then trying to > > leverage it in questionable trade practices for corporate gain. The fact > > that GW was never notified of the concern while its product has been in > > beta with public demos strongly suggests that the aim is to damage GW > > economically, not actually to protect intellectual property. > > > > What do others think? > > > > Jamal > > On > > Fri, 25 Jul > > 2008, Ken Perry wrote: > > > > > Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:43:30 -0700 > > > From: Ken Perry <whistler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Reply-To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: RE: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again > > > > > > > > > > > > I say let them fight and while they are fighting I hope Saratek is > coding. > > > > > > Ken > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jared Wright > > > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 6:58 PM > > > To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: Re: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again > > > > > > Hi James, Worked here just now, so I'm not sure what's at fault. The > long > > > and short is that Freedom claims GW Micro's implementation of webpage > > > placemarkers in Window Eyes 7 violates their patint on, I guess, being > able > > > to have placemarkers on a webpage. They filed litigation today. > > > > > > Jared > > > > > > > > > Jared > > > > > > James Panes wrote: > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > Just thought I would let you know that this page is not available. > > > > > > > > Did FS lawyers have something to do with this? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Jim > > > > jimpanes@xxxxxxxxx > > > > jimpanes@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > "Everything is easy when you know how." > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Jared Wright" <wright.jaredm@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 12:53 PM > > > > Subject: Freedom Scientific's Lawyers Strike Again > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.gwmicro.com/blog/index.php/all/2008/07/24/do_companies_real > > > > ly_compete_on_who_has_t > > > > > > > > Read it and weep, at least if seeing screen readers compete on their > > > > functionality for all our general betterment is at all appealing to > you. > > > > Jared > > > > > > > > > > > > __________ > > > > View the list's information and change your settings at > > > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > > > > > > > __________ > > > > View the list's information and change your settings at > > > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________ > > > View the list's information and change your settings at > > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > > > > > __________ > > > View the list's information and change your settings at > > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > > > > __________ > > View the list's information and change your settings at > > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > "Information in this email (including attachments) is confidential. > It is intended for receipt and consideration only by the intended recipient. > If you are not an addressee or intended recipient, any use, dissemination, > distribution, disclosure, publication or copying of information contained in > this email is strictly prohibited. Opinions expressed in this email may be > personal to the author and are not necessarily the opinions of the HSE. > > If this email has been received by you in error we would be grateful if you > could immediately notify the ICT Service Desk by telephone at +353 1 6352757 > or by email to service.desk@xxxxxxxxxxxx and thereafter delete this > e-mail from your system" > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > __________ > View the list's information and change your settings at > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind