Hi Sina, As with screen readers, I suppose people can be pretty fanatical about their chosen languages. To the point of it being almost impossible to see which things are valued and why on the other side of the fence. Still, there are probably as many kind of preferences as there are readers. I can understand K&R docs in the book all right but faced with even simple set theory axioms, I become lost and have to ponder for a long long time, and make a concrete case before it makes sense to me. Once I'm able to render it in my head, using mostly natural language, only then do things become clearer Another example is K&R and a friend of mine who is very poor in English. he likes K&R since there's less content to read the get essentially the same thing across. Yet another simplification Ive seen in code that isnt written by native English speakers, is the use of mixed case names even in English compound words. That's to avoid having to know whether a particular word is a compound in English. The rules are quite different in English and Finnish, for example. Last but least, I never said or at least didn't mean to imply that PHP docs were CHm only or that things were not documented. Rather, I intended to say that things were not documented as rigorously and in the style I happen to like. Maybe you picked up an earlier post I happened to skip after skimming, not sure about this and it isn't very relevant, either. -- With kind regards Veli-Pekka Tätilä (vtatila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) Accessibility, game music, synthesizers and programming: http://www.student.oulu.fi/~vtatila Sina Bahram wrote: > Oh, I don't care which one is better or not worth it or so on. Such > discussios only make their proponents happy, and I'm not sure they add > anything. > > I just wanted to point out that php is indeed documented in a different way > than just a .chm file. __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind