There is still a c++ compiler from Borland that is not out of date and compiles some tight code but the install program is about as accessible as a java program in 64 bit. Ken -----Original Message----- From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Littlefield, Tyler Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 5:11 PM To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: C++ Compilers for Windows, and a Good Book bloodshed dev c++ was an IDE around mingw. Borland (AFAIK) is horribly outdated. On 12/16/2010 2:57 PM, qubit wrote: > I haven't used either, but there used to be a C++ compiler from Borland, and > also a compiler called "bloodshed". Have these gone by the wayside? There > was also a free one that used to be populer called dev++. I haven't used it > either, just remember a lot of people were using them for a while. > Lately only gcc and the Microsoft c++ compiler are being mentioned. > --le > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joseph Lee"<joseph.lee22590@xxxxxxxxx> > To:<programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 3:29 PM > Subject: RE: C++ Compilers for Windows, and a Good Book > > > Hi, > I used to use Borland compiler, but since installing VS2008, I use VS for my > projects. > As for books, I read C++ Cookbook and Practical C++ Programming (O'Reilly > Books). I sometimes read Steve Heller's C++ A Dialogue (when I just started > learning about C++). > Cheers, > Joseph > > -----Original Message----- > From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kerneels Roos > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:59 AM > To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: C++ Compilers for Windows, and a Good Book > > Hi list, > > Apart from the MinGW suite and Cygwin that both provide GCC , are there > any other compilers for C++ that you guys can recommend -- including > commercial ones -- for Windows? > > Last week I read a few chapters from the classic Thinking in C++ book > available from www.mindview.com, and I was reminded again what an > excellent language C++ still is. The book is really very good and > comprises 2 volumes covering a lot of ground. C++ is not a simple > language, with many, many features you can shoot yourself in the foot > with, but that is the price of power, execution speed and flexibility, > and maintaining compatibility with C (part of the design objectives of > the language). > > Most of us will probably not code business applications in C++, but I > would encourage any serious programmer to study it to gain a deeper > understanding of how Java and C# solves many of the difficult areas of > C++ programming. If you fully understand the language and all it's > features I think you might be able to code amazing applications and > API's that will run fast and efficient. You will also be able to > appreciate the contribution that more modern languages have made to the > world of programming. > > It will be very interesting to see what the future holds for C++. From > what I can understand there seems to be an effort underway to establish > a new standard for the language code named 0X. > Regards. > -- Thanks, Ty __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind