[procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch?
- From: Jim Warner <james.warner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 05:16:14 -0600
On Feb 9, 2012, at 4:53 AM, Jaromir Capik wrote:
> Actually I did my own tests on my workstation with:
> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU W3520 @ 2.67GHz
>
> The test application was producing a fixed amount of load triggered
> by the system clock each second and the results were surprisingly
> opposite:
>
> 1.) with frequency set to 2.66GHz the load was approximately 34%
> 2.) with frequency set to 1.73GHz the load was approximately 52%
>
> Whilst the load should be 34% in both cases ...
>
> I tested that with procps 3.2.8 and procps-ng 3.3.2 and both of them
> returned the same result.
Hi Jaromir,
I was referring to tics, not load.
And your loads look proper given the frequencies.
Jim
Other related posts:
