[procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch?

  • From: Craig Small <csmall-procps@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 21:04:01 +1100

On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 07:40:43PM -0600, Jim Warner wrote:
> So just to be clear, the five git am patches in misc-top-patches.tgz should 
> be applied first.  Then the two patches in 2-more-4-top.tgz can be applied.
They have been applied now, in that order. I applied Sami's ones first
but there were no conflicts.

> p.s. I was poking around in the your 'procps_3.3.2-3.debian.tar.gz' and 
> noticed one residual obsolete top patch.  It's the one called 
> 'top_no_openproc.patch' and can be deleted.
It's not being applied (not in the series file) but for completeness yes 
it will go next release.

 - Craig

-- 
Craig Small VK2XLZ   http://enc.com.au/          csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux     http://www.debian.org/      csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint:     5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2  0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5

Other related posts: