[pisa-src] Re: r1240 - in trunk/community-operator: Makefile.am co_client.c
- From: Thomas Jansen <mithi@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pisa-src@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:04:06 +0200
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:49:52AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> Well, "because they suck" is never a good answer to the question "Why do
> we suck?" :)
That's true. Still there is no easy solution for the problem, even if we don't
like it.
> For some reason overusing -I is very popular. I guess once autotools
> have made your brain rot for long enough people just don't notice
> ugliness any longer...
That leads back to the idea of moving our headers from include to libpisa.
Also we could use -I. as the only PISA include flag and prepend the path in
all include statements. This would also improve readability because we know
exactly where to look for that specific header file on top of not polluting
the global include file namespace.
It also suggests to remove autotools from the list of PISA dependencies. ;)
--
Thomas Jansen, "Mithi" --- mithi@xxxxxxxxx
GPG 9D5C682B, feel free to sign or encrypt your mail
Other related posts:
