[phorm] [Phorm:] that worked, but another question...
- From: webbbs@xxxxxxxxx
- To: support@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Mar 2004 14:40:52 -0000
The following new message has been posted on Phorm Support Forum at
<http://www.phorm.com/support/>.
***************************************************************************
MESSAGE: (#3926) that worked, but another question...
<http://www.phorm.com/support/?rev=3926>
AUTHOR: Mary Ellen
DATE: March 30, 2004 at 9:40 a.m. EST
Reply To: (#3925) Re: parse error in rules file
Author: Holotech
Date: March 30, 2004 at 7:04 a.m. EST
In making one thing easier, I managed to shoot myself in the foot with the
rules.
Instead of passing a literal to the config files, I changed the form so it
passes a number. Zero means the field isn't in use, but the zero makes the
rules file think the field has been completed. What's the easiest way around
that?
***************************************************************************
This is an automatically-generated notice. If you'd like to be removed from
the mailing list, please visit Phorm Support Forum at
<http://www.phorm.com/support/>, or send your request to webbbs@xxxxxxxxxx If
you wish to respond to this message, please post your response directly to the
board. Thank you!
-------------------------------------------------
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the Phorm mailing
list. To send messages to the mailing list, simply send email to
phorm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx from the address you have subscribed. You may unsubscribe
from the list by sending email to phorm-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the SUBJECT field.
Other related posts:
- » [phorm] [Phorm:] that worked, but another question...
