[phorm] [Phorm:] Re: that worked, but another question...
- From: webbbs@xxxxxxxxx
- To: support@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 31 Mar 2004 04:38:14 -0000
The following new message has been posted on Phorm Support Forum at
<http://www.phorm.com/support/>.
***************************************************************************
MESSAGE: (#3929) Re: that worked, but another question...
<http://www.phorm.com/support/?rev=3929>
AUTHOR: David Fisher
DATE: March 30, 2004 at 11:38 p.m. EST
Reply To: (#3926) that worked, but another question...
Author: Mary Ellen
Date: March 30, 2004 at 9:40 a.m. EST
You could use PHP's un-operator(!):
$i != 0;
would evaluate true only if $i was not equal to 0.
Your rule might look like this:
RULE: 1
CRIT: REQ
FFLD: field_name
COND: $field_name != 0
This rule would require that field_name had a value that was not equal to 0.
You could string multiple un-equals and ORs together to accomplish your goal.
> In making one thing easier, I managed to shoot myself
> in the foot with the rules.
> Instead of passing a literal to the config files, I
> changed the form so it passes a number. Zero means the
> field isn't in use, but the zero makes the rules file
> think the field has been completed. What's the easiest
> way around that?
***************************************************************************
This is an automatically-generated notice. If you'd like to be removed from
the mailing list, please visit Phorm Support Forum at
<http://www.phorm.com/support/>, or send your request to webbbs@xxxxxxxxxx If
you wish to respond to this message, please post your response directly to the
board. Thank you!
-------------------------------------------------
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the Phorm mailing
list. To send messages to the mailing list, simply send email to
phorm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx from the address you have subscribed. You may unsubscribe
from the list by sending email to phorm-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the SUBJECT field.
Other related posts:
- » [phorm] [Phorm:] Re: that worked, but another question...
