good question?...is Fernando ok?
Subject: [phoenixchorale exec] Re: Revised Contract Doc - Both pdf and Word
Versions
From: l.atherton@xxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 15:12:10 -0500
To: phoenixchoraleex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks everyone for the timely comments. Here is the latest draft of the JD.
Changes made:1. Removed “When signed…” from first paragraph.2. Changed verb
forms throughout.3. Added “The Artistic Director shall:” at beginning of
Section A.4. Did not change #2, except for verb forms. (Rory, the Music
Committee has no business deciding when and what Deirdre can add to our
repertoire for the year. If she presents too few pieces at the beginning of the
year, then the Music Committee can step in immediately and insist on getting
more music ASAP. If she still doesn’t comply, then we can take more drastic
action. In other words, we need to educate the Music Committee that they are
responsible for pressing the AD, if need be, to get a fairly complete music
list before the start of the concert year, and that the Board will back them
up.)5. “proposed concert dates" added to #3.6. Compensation text added to #5 &
#6.7. Removed “that she deems…"8. I think #9 is needed. I added a second part
to the sentence. Let me know if you still think it should be removed.9. #12 - I
removed “invited” so solicit is no longer redundant.
I’m going out for a bit. I will check for your comments and finish this draft
when I get home this evening.
Margaret, I’ll send you a separate doc with just the AD on it for forwarding to
Deirdre.
Linda
P.S - Has anyone heard from Fernando? Hope he’s OK.
On Feb 7, 2016, at 2:38 PM, Anna Benoit <tionebanna@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Looks
good to me. Thanks for ally our work .
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 7, 2016, at 11:42, roryphoenix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Here are my modifications for the Job Description.
PLEASE NOTE: I am not looking at the final contract wording until the job
description is agreed upon by us and Deirdre.
One change of note I made: I gave the AD complete control over rejecting a
singer. I removed the part about not being able to bring them up to speed. I
don't think she needs to justify rejecting someone. If we don't like those
decisions, we can replace the AD. Otherwise I think that is micromanaging.
Thanks.
Rory
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:11:37 -0500, Linda Atherton <l.atherton@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Here is it. Let me know what I’ve missed and/or misunderstood.
Thx!
Linda
Linda Atherton
100 State St Apt 102
Portland, ME 04101
207-747-5918