[pedevel] Re: jam 2.5rc3 and a feature request

  • From: "BiPolar" <BiPolar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pedevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 04:00:44 -0300 ART

Joachim Seemer wrote:

> Anyway, does this extra icon really make sense? For one, even so the 
> softwrapping is activated, the icon still suggests "no wrapping" as the 
> lines aren't wrapped at that, now dark red, line.

It doesn't IMO. I would rather like Pe to resize to:
Window's width = (# entered in Fixed Column's pref) * (width of "w" for the 
current font).
for new files (or when there's no pe_info attribute data).

BTW, I would love to Zoom (ALT+/) to that width instead of full screen.

> I don't see the sense in an extra icon state when "central softwrap" is 
> enabled. Either the text wraps or it doesn't; no matter if the wrapping 
> is done by default from the preferences or by clicking the softwrap-
> icon.

Don't look at us, it was Maarten! :-P

Oscar.

Other related posts: