-=PCTechTalk=- Re: MB's?

  • From: Gman <gman.pctt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:20:59 -0500

How about just selling drives that equal 500GB of usable space AFTER 
formatting?  The public really won't care if that means 536GB of space on 
the platters.       ;)

Peace,
Gman
http://www.bornagainamerican.org

"The only dumb questions are the ones we fail to ask"

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Disastar" <disastar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 8:05 PM
Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: MB's?


>I agree they should have used the industry standard, but there is another
> way to look at it... what if they were originally rounding off?  If you
> called a 250 GB drive the real value of 232 GB, then you would have to 
> think
> a little more to figure out if that 465 GB drive is twice as much storage.
> Even numbers like 100, 200, 250, 400, 500, 600, 750 are easier to remember
> and deal with.  OK, so the first hard drives I can remember were 5 MB, so
> they should have been called 4.768 MB drives?
>
> Oh, and Stefan, I do remember hearing several times about the difference
> between k and K, but I have never seen it used consistently.  And besides,
> kB looks kinda weird.  Hehe
>
> Ed 

---------------------------------------------------------------
Please remember to trim your replies (including this sentence and everything 
below it) and adjust the subject line as necessary.

To unsubscribe or change your email settings:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk

To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
//www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/

To contact only the PCTT Mod Squad, write to:
pctechtalk-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

To join the PCTableTalk off-topic group, send a blank email to:
pctabletalk+subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: