How about just selling drives that equal 500GB of usable space AFTER formatting? The public really won't care if that means 536GB of space on the platters. ;) Peace, Gman http://www.bornagainamerican.org "The only dumb questions are the ones we fail to ask" ----- Original Message ----- From: "Disastar" <disastar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 8:05 PM Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: MB's? >I agree they should have used the industry standard, but there is another > way to look at it... what if they were originally rounding off? If you > called a 250 GB drive the real value of 232 GB, then you would have to > think > a little more to figure out if that 465 GB drive is twice as much storage. > Even numbers like 100, 200, 250, 400, 500, 600, 750 are easier to remember > and deal with. OK, so the first hard drives I can remember were 5 MB, so > they should have been called 4.768 MB drives? > > Oh, and Stefan, I do remember hearing several times about the difference > between k and K, but I have never seen it used consistently. And besides, > kB looks kinda weird. Hehe > > Ed --------------------------------------------------------------- Please remember to trim your replies (including this sentence and everything below it) and adjust the subject line as necessary. To unsubscribe or change your email settings: //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk To access our Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/ To contact only the PCTT Mod Squad, write to: pctechtalk-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To join the PCTableTalk off-topic group, send a blank email to: pctabletalk+subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---------------------------------------------------------------