Hi Pam, I see what you mean. I guess the issue for me is "how important" is the original photo v disk space. I guess I had better keep my son's wedding pictures as an original format. :-) Btw, he works where you were and it is top secret and he never talks about his job. Carl ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pam" <ltf01@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <pcductape@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:35 PM Subject: [pcductape] FW: [PC-Ductape] Batch conversions - it works > Yikes, I sent this to topica without realizing it. Topica balked at the > attachments and bounced it back to me. =( > > Here goes again. > > Pam > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pam [mailto:ltf01@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:30 PM > To: pcductape@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PC-Ductape] Batch conversions - it works > > > Technically, yes. But you will lose quality when you resize it back up. > The degree of quality will depend on the quality of the original image, how > much you reduce the size, what compression rate you choose, and then how > much you increase the size back to. > To give you an example of what I mean, attached are 3 pics, the original > DCP_3586, reduced 50% DCP_3586reduced50, and the 3rd image is the reduced > image blown back up to its original size. Compare the quality of the 2 big > images. > The pic, btw, was taken a couple of weeks ago at NASA in Houston. It is of > the original Mission Control room, which is no longer in service as of last > year. It is now deemed a historical thing. We weren't allowed to view or > even know the location of the new Mission Control room. > > Pam To unsubscribe from this list send an email to pcductape-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field OR by logging into the Web interface.