..
The last sentence is the relevant bit. I
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms securing certain rights and freedoms other than those
already included in the Convention and in the First Protocol thereto
Strasbourg, 16.IX.1963 The Governments signatory hereto, being members of the
Council of Europe, Being resolved to take steps to ensure the collective
enforcement of certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in
Section I of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms signed at Rome on 4th November1950 (hereinafter referred to as the
“Convention”) and in Articles 1 to 3 of the First Protocol to the Convention,
signed at Paris on 20th March 1952, Have agreed as follows: ARTICLE 1
Prohibition of imprisonment for debt No one shall be deprived of his liberty
merely on the ground of inability to fulfil a contractual obligation.
If a court fines you it is a contractual obligation. This is because they need
you to consent being responsible for your legal fiction. By consenting you are
contracting with the court.
* The courts are imprisoning people for non payment of fines or council tax
for failing to comply with a court order to pay. If those people refused to
consent to being responsible for their legal fiction and send in a notice to
the clerk to the court issuing the summons that as a living (wo)man you refuse
to be responsible for the legal fiction then that will be the end of the
matter. You could add the human rights legislation.
