RE: x$kghlu, Steve's shared_pool_lru_stats

From: "Nahata, Naveen (US - Hyderabad)" <nnahata@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <boris_dali@xxxxxxxx>, <tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:01:52 -0600

This email caught my eyes browsing through 100s of unread ORACLE-L
email. I didn't find any answer to this question so decided to reply.

Boris,

The value of _kghsidx_count is dependent on 2 factors. One is the size
of shared pool and the other is CPU. Not sure if this algorithm is
absolutely right, but it is close.

_kghsidx_count =3D ROUND ( LEAST ( No. Of CPUs / 4, Shared Pool (in MB)/
128 ) )

Naveen

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Boris Dali
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 10:11 PM
To: tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: x$kghlu, Steve's shared_pool_lru_stats

I toyed around with the size of the shared pool in the
attempt to get 3 heaps, but to no avail. Even setting
shared_pool_size to 20GB didn't produce 3 heaps. Just
curious how does one get 7?

Also a more practical question (I think). If my
"optimal" shared pool size is around 250MB (i.e. at
150-200MB I get ORA-4031), would I be better off with
240MB and a single heap or at 250MB and dual heaps?

Thanks,
Boris Dali.



This message (including any attachments) contains confidential =
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is =
protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should =
delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this =
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly =
prohibited.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

RE: x$kghlu, Steve's shared_pool_lru_stats

Other related posts: