Am I correct then to assume that if I rebuild the standby database that the
primary database will no longer list the five datafiles from January/February
as unrecoverable? Or do I have a potential issue with the primary database
here?
Some history: When building the standby, I did force logging on the primary. I
do not recall if that was before or after the Jan/Feb timeframe.
I will run the rman verification commands to see what happens..
Thanks all!
I forgot to mention, sorry, your standby database istrash! >The unrecoverable
transactions that took place on theprimary, back in January and February, were
never applied to the standby. Ifyou ever >need to run the standby as a primary
(switchover or failover) or as aread only reporting database, then any
transactions that try to read the >tablesloaded with the unrecoverable data
will error out, probably as>follows:
