RE: two databases in a server

  • Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:04:00 -0600

We do have several applications that share an instance, but that's
because those apps generally are related (e.g. data from one app schema
needed in another).  But I don't see any benefit of merging unrelated
apps with distinctly different data and access methods (e.g. data entry
vs. DSS/query vs. automated data collection).  I'd think off-hand that
it would make that one monolithic instance much more difficult to manage
than several smaller ones (shared_pool flogging comes to mind).

And I think the need to migrate the apps to another instance for
app-specific version upgrades has already been mentioned.

My $.02,
Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ric Van Dyke
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 12:05 PM
To: tom@xxxxxxxxx; David Sharples
Cc: Oracle-L@Freelists. Org (E-mail)
Subject: RE: two databases in a server


Generally it's bad because there is a certain level of resource
consumption for an instance of any size.  So pay the price ONCE and have
an instance large enough to do all the work needed by all the
applications using the database.  There can be cases where multiple
instances on the same box are needed, but many cases that I have seen it
was not needed.  Many times folks can use one instance (or at least
fewer instances) to get the work done.  

Ric Van Dyke
Hotsos Enterprises
-----------------------
Hotsos Symposium, be there:
http://www.hotsos.com/portal/events/SYM06

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Fox
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 12:53 PM
To: David Sharples
Cc: roger_xu@xxxxxxxxxxx; Oracle-L@Freelists. Org (E-mail)
Subject: Re: two databases in a server

I've heard the argument before about having more than one instance on a 
machine is a bad idea.

However, on the flip side, having 50 applications share one instance can

be bad, as if one app needs a particular patch, you're affecting 49
other 
applications due to one application's requirements.

Anyone care to elaborate why more than one instance is bad?

--Tom

On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, David Sharples wrote:

> by joining them into a single instance - that is best practise
> 
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: