Re: trying to understand an awr report

  • From: Kerry Osborne <kerry.osborne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: eglewis71@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 19:46:38 -0500

Generally that would be a statement that didn't complete by the time the ending 
snapshot was taken. Like so:

  Elapsed      CPU                  Elap per  % Total
  Time (s)   Time (s)  Executions   Exec (s)  DB Time    SQL Id
---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ------- -------------
       257        163            0        N/A    82.8 gf5nnx0pyfqq2
Module: SQL*Plus
select a.col2, sum(a.col1) from kso.skew a, kso.skew b group by a.col2

That statement was still running when that ending snapshot was taken. 

Also notice that the elapsed time per exec is rounded to the nearest tenth of a 
second. So if it says 0.0 that means that the statement averaged less than 0.05 
seconds.

Kerry Osborne
Enkitec
blog: kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com






On May 9, 2011, at 7:21 PM, ed lewis wrote:

>  
> Hi,
>     I'm trying to understand some of the information in
> an AWR report.
>  
>     Specifically,
>  
> - The "executions" column and "Elap per exec"  , in several cases is empty,
>   but shows "DB time",   "Elapsed TIme", and "CPU time". 
>   Can anyone explain that ?
>  
> - 1 transactions shows 5.509,111 executions but
>   no "elap per exec". 
>  
>     These numbers are from 9 hours of snapshots.
>  
> Solaris 10,   RDBMS, and RAC 10.2.0.4.
>  
>     Your comments are appreciated.
>  
>         thanks
>  
>         ed
>  
>   
> Resources reported for PL/SQL code includes the resources used by all SQL 
> statements called by the code.
> % Total DB Time is the Elapsed Time of the SQL statement divided into the 
> Total Database Time multiplied by 100
> Elapsed Time (s)      CPU Time (s)    Executions      Elap per Exec (s)       
> % Total DB Time SQL Id  SQL Module      SQL Text
> 16,520        16,518  19,286  0.86    4.03    d4fdhcjs2vndp           SELECT 
> C603210194 FROM T2245 W...
> 12,041        12,023                  2.94    3ycgb4yb5svuc           SELECT 
> T954.C1, C1000000161 FR...
> 11,554        11,528                  2.82    00yn69r0dguk6           SELECT 
> T954.C1, C1000000161 FR...
> 11,441        9,214   19,384  0.59    2.79    41cnaprwx32n6           SELECT 
> cdintegrationid FROM bm...
> 11,356        11,337                  2.77    gvtgqv0gqx6nn           SELECT 
> T954.C1, C1000000161 FR...
> 7,877 7,875                   1.92    fyb6g4640yaag           SELECT T954.C1, 
> C1000000161 FR...
> 7,465 1       5       1492.91 1.82    cmdx8dhbwnncy           DELETE FROM 
> T129 WHERE C1 = :"...
> 6,731 6,728                   1.64    0pks9t80ukx0s           SELECT T936.C1 
> FROM T936 WHERE...
> 5,947 2,982   1,308   4.55    1.45    4rkq5f7cx0aau           SELECT T1346.C1 
> FROM T1346 WHE...
> 5,134 5,122   134     38.31   1.25    9g2vbj6d66ssr           SELECT T954.C1, 
> C1000000161, C...
> 4,990 4,843   5,509,111       0.00    1.22    9dqj7wx3yc9yq           SELECT 
> fieldId, vuiId, propSho...
> 4,807 4,807   32      150.23  1.17    0xjy5qb0z6s1w           SELECT T727.C1, 
> C10000001, C30...

Other related posts: