Re: oracle v SS

  • From: Orlando L <oralrnr@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rjoralist3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 13:24:08 -0600

"Allows customers to install and run passive SQL Server instances in a
separate OSE or server on-premises for disaster recovery"

Does this mean the passive SQL server can be configured in a geographically
remote site?


On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 10:39 AM Rich J <rjoralist3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

I didn't see this recent MS announcement of free "passive" licensing for
HA/DR in this thread:


https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2019/10/30/new-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-benefits-for-sql-server/

That seems...huge.  Oracle has had some great announcements recently, like
with the PDB extension and Free Autonomous offering, but nothing to this
scale.

Rich

*Von: *Andre Maasikas <amaasikas@xxxxxxxxx>
*Datum *Samstag, 09. Nov. 2019, 4:46 PM
*An: *wbfergus@xxxxxxxxx <wbfergus@xxxxxxxxx>
*Cc: *Oracle-L Freelists <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Betreff: *Re: oracle v SS

Certainly not free, same with plsql mentioned earlier, all these use the
"licensed" cpu power which costs you about 100K €/$ per processor
definition (counting common enterprise options) initial license and 1/4 of
that each year thereafter.
Andre




Other related posts: