RE: optimizer time reported as?
- From: "Bobak, Mark" <Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <stellr@xxxxxxxxxx>, "John Kanagaraj" <john.kanagaraj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:50:33 -0500
Ray,
Try searching on 'optimizer_max_permutations'. I suspect that will
yield more hits....
-Mark
--
Mark J. Bobak
Senior Oracle Architect
ProQuest Information & Learning
"There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand
binary, and those who don't."
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ray Stell
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:47 AM
To: John Kanagaraj
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: optimizer time reported as?
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:54:55PM -0800, John Kanagaraj wrote:
> to se opt-max-perm to 2000 8i and above, which was not done. (I was
> also
0 metalink/google hits on opt-max-perm. "I hate it when that happens."
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Bobak;Mark
FN:Bobak, Mark
ORG:ProQuest Information and Learning;Database Group
TITLE:Software Architect, Sr-TPD
TEL;WORK;VOICE:734.975.6086
ADR;WORK:;ECC4-N01E04;1400 Eisenhower Parkway
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:ECC4-N01E04=0D=0A1400 Eisenhower Parkway
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
REV:20051213T223654Z
END:VCARD
Other related posts:
