Re: multiple patchsets
- From: Jurijs Velikanovs <j.velikanovs@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: hkchital@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:26:01 +0000
>> and hope that the alerts have already been issued at least the day
before I apply the patchset
Do not install a patchset straight away after it is realest. Wait 1/2 of year.
If you have been pushed to install new patch, install it in a test environment.
If you got any problems log a SR with high priority.
I would say it is normal DBA live nowadays.
PS I don't believe it is just Oracle. Probably it is because many big
SW companies doing developing outscoring and are in the rush to make a
profit.
Jurijs
On 1/6/06, Hemant K Chitale <hkchital@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> <rant and rave mode ON>
> All of which sounds ridiculous. Going by that logic, I should not have
> applied
> the CPU-Oct05 patch without having applied the CPU-Jul05 patch .... no ,
> wait a minute,
> I should have applied the CPU-Apr05 .. or even the CPU-Jan05 patch ...
>
> How could they assume that we religiously apply every patchset ? How many
> times in a year should I schedule downtime for the 24x7 ERP database ?
> If we could jump from 8.0.6.x to 9.2.0.1, surely we could go from 9.2.0.1
> to 9.2.0.6 or
> 9.2.0.2 to 9.2.07. The PatchSet README's DO SAY that they are *cumulative*
> !
>
> <normal, hardworking DBA mode ON>
> oh well. Before I apply the latest patchset I must look out for alerts
> recommending,
> pre-patch patches [and hope that the alerts have already been issued at
> least the day
> before I apply the patchset].
>
> Hemant K Chitale
>
> At 06:07 AM Friday, Paul Drake wrote:
> On 1/5/06, Ray Stell <stellr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Concerning Solaris 64bit 9.2.0.4.
>
> I found this note that says I have to apply 9.2.0.6 before 9.2.0.7.
>
>
>
> Ray,
>
> That sounds quite familiar.
> Originally, 9i R2 for lin_x86 was released as 9.2.0.3.
> It was later re-released as 9.2.0.4.
> The 9.2.0.5 patchset could not be applied to 9.2.0.3.
> At the time, there was no note about it - it was simply a difference of
> assumptions
> (the patchset was produced with the assumption that 9.2.0.4 had been
> applied).
>
>
>
> Hemant K Chitale
> http://web.singnet.com.sg/~hkchital
>
> -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
Jurijs
+44 7738 013090 (GMT)
============================================
http://otn.oracle.com/ocm/jvelikanovs.html
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
