Any chance this could be a user-configurable option? I typically sort = by message header, and absolutely *detest* the "[list-name]" prefix = scheme. -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Johan Muller Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 9:05 AM To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [oracle-l] Re: list configuration As per normal, could you please leave it in. I use it (oracle-l) to help sort my Inbox in Outlook. In fact I adopted the notation to help = identify my other system messages (up to 300 over 24 hours). My $0.02 worth but perhaps we can vote, offer bribes etc. -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jared Still Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 9:05 AM To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [oracle-l] list configuration I've been asked if I can remove the [oracle-l] from the subject header. A: probably. Just don't have time to do it for a day or so. Any other issues, let me know. Jared