Which ones? I have explained the semantics of the semaphore parameters.
Nobody questioned that semantics. The rest of my statements logically
follows that syntax. The statement that SEMMNS should be larger or
equal, idally equal, to SEMMSL*SEMMNI follows from that syntax. If
SEMMNS < SEMMSL*SEMMNI then you will not be able to allosace SEMMNI
semaphore sets with the length of SEMMSL. That is the reason for my
objection to 3000 32000 3000 128 advice. That advice was obviously given
by a junior support analyst who doesn't understand semaphores very well
because that recommendation doesn't conform to the semantics of the
semaphore parameters.
This feels like whipping a dead horse. We're getting nowhere. I
understand that you don't like me, but the facts are the facts.
On 2/13/21 3:13 PM, dimensional.dba@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
It is not about being right, it is about being technically accurate. You
make statements with no facts.
