Never encountered that, and I would *hope* that common sense would prevail to the extent that Oracle Support would only allow this to become an issue in cases where the absence of a C compiler could have a *plausible* affect -- such as the inability to natively-compile your PL/SQL. That said, I would be lying if I said I had never encountered an Oracle Support engineer who acted a little bit like a bone-head. Usually, a quick escalation to a "manager" will sort things like this out, but I suppose there may indeed be a risk here. As a DBA, your life *will* be easier if you can get approval to install the compilers and keep them installed. Sadly, though, most security people could not care two figs for the quality of your life. ;-) If you get really lucky though, you could maybe arrange to have the compilers installed, and then maybe people might *forget* to later remove them. On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Rich Jesse <rjoralist3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote: > Chris writes: > > > Greetings all! I’m doing a fresh installation of Oracle 12c and 11g > on a > > new linuxRHEL6 server. Pre-requisites include gcc and gcc-c++ compilers. > The > > systemadmin wants to remove these compilers after installation because > > theyconstitute a security risk. I’m thinking doing so should be okay, > as > > long as thesecompilers are re-installed when Oracle patches are applied. > > Does anyone haveexperience doing this? Thanks in advance.ChrisK > > If it's part of the pre-req, then they may also be required for any SRs > where Support asks for an RPM listing. If they're not there, your may run > into trouble getting your SR worked on. > > Just a thought... > > Rich > > -- > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > >